Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-168823

 

PROSPECTUS

 

 

MCE Finance Limited

(incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability)

Offer to exchange all of the Outstanding Unregistered

US$600,000,000 10.25% Senior Notes due 2018

(CUSIP Nos. 55277B AA3, G59301 AA2; ISIN US55277BAA35, USG59301AA28),

for

US$600,000,000 10.25% Senior Notes due 2018

that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933

(CUSIP No. 55277B AB1, ISIN US55277BAB18)

 

 

 

 

The Exchange Offer:

 

 

The Exchange Notes:

 

 

Resale of the Exchange Notes:

 

 

Each broker-dealer who holds Initial Notes acquired for its own account as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, and who receives Exchange Notes in exchange for the Initial Notes pursuant to the exchange offer, may be a statutory underwriter and must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of such Exchange Notes. The letter of transmittal accompanying this prospectus states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of Exchange Notes received in exchange for the Initial Notes where such Initial Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

 

 

 

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 17 of this prospectus for a discussion of certain risks you should consider before participating in the exchange offer.

 

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

The date of this prospectus is November 12, 2010.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

You should rely only on the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus or to which this prospectus refers you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with any information that is different. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making the exchange offer in any jurisdiction where the exchange offer is not permitted. You should assume that the information in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, as well as the information we have previously filed with the SEC or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, is accurate only as of the date of the documents containing the information.

 

In making an investment decision, you must rely on your own examination of us and the terms of the exchange offer, including the merits and risks involved. These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities commission in the United States or any other

United States regulatory authority, nor have any of the foregoing authorities passed upon or endorsed the merits of the exchange offer or the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense in the United States.

 

 

 

 

This prospectus incorporates by reference important business and financial information about us that is not included in or delivered with this prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.” You may read and copy any reports or other information that we filed with the SEC. Such filings are available to you over the internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The SEC’s website is included in this prospectus as an inactive textual reference only. You may also read and copy any document that we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain a copy of the exchange offer registration statement and other information that we file with the SEC at no cost by calling us or writing to us at the following address:

 

MCE Finance Limited
c/o Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
36th Floor, The Centrium
60 Wyndham Street
Central
Hong Kong
Attn: Company Secretary
(852) 2598 3600

 

In order to obtain timely delivery of such materials, you must request documents from us no later than five business days before you make your investment decision or at the latest by December 15, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

NEITHER THE FACT THAT A REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN APPLICATION FOR A LICENSE HAS BEEN FILED UNDER CHAPTER 421-B OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE REVISED STATUTES WITH THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NOR THE FACT THAT A SECURITY IS EFFECTIVELY REGISTERED OR A PERSON IS LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTITUTES A FINDING BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE THAT ANY DOCUMENT FILED UNDER RSA 421-B IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING. NEITHER ANY SUCH FACT NOR THE FACT THAT AN EXEMPTION OR EXCEPTION IS AVAILABLE FOR A SECURITY OR A TRANSACTION MEANS THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE HAS PASSED IN ANY WAY UPON THE MERITS OR QUALIFICATIONS OF, OR RECOMMENDED OR GIVEN APPROVAL TO, ANY PERSON, SECURITY OR TRANSACTION. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE, OR CAUSE TO BE MADE, TO ANY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER, CUSTOMER OR CLIENT, ANY REPRESENTATION INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH.

 

In this prospectus, unless otherwise indicated,

 

 

 

Our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Our reporting currency is U.S. dollars.

 

Certain numerical figures set out in this prospectus, including financial data presented in millions or thousands, have been subject to rounding adjustments and, as a result, the totals of the data in this prospectus may vary slightly from the actual arithmetic totals of such information. Percentages and amounts reflecting changes over time periods relating to financial and other data set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are calculated using the numerical data in our consolidated financial statements or the tabular presentation of other data (subject to rounding) contained in this prospectus, as applicable, and not using the numerical data in the narrative description thereof.

 

This prospectus contains non GAAP financial measures and ratios that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, U.S. GAAP. We present non GAAP financial measures because we believe that they and similar measures are widely used by certain investors, securities analysts and other interested parties as supplemental measures of performance. We use non GAAP financial measures as measures of the operating performance of our properties and to compare the operating performance of our properties with those of our competitors. The non GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results reported under U.S. GAAP. Non GAAP financial measures and ratios are not measurements of our performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to operating income or net profit or any other performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP or any other generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We obtained the market and industry information used in this prospectus from our own research, surveys or studies conducted by third parties and industry or general publications, including The Macau Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau, or DICJ, and other publicly available sources. Industry and general publications and surveys generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. Although we have not independently verified the market data and related information contained in this prospectus, we believe such data and information is accurate as of the date of this prospectus or the respective earlier dates specified herein.

 

MCE Finance is incorporated in the Cayman Islands to take advantage of certain benefits associated with being a Cayman Islands exempted company, such as:

 

 

However, certain disadvantages accompany incorporation in the Cayman Islands. These disadvantages include:

 

 

The constituent documents of MCE Finance do not contain provisions requiring that disputes, including those arising under the securities laws of the United States, between MCE Finance, its officers, directors and shareholders, be arbitrated.

 

Substantially all of our current operations, including our administrative and corporate operations, are conducted in Macau and Hong Kong, and substantially all of our assets are located in Macau. A majority of our directors and officers are nationals or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for a holder of the Exchange Notes to effect service of process within the United States upon us or such persons, or to enforce against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

 

MCE Finance has appointed CT Corporation System as its agent to receive service of process with respect to any action brought against MCE Finance in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under the federal securities laws of the United States or of any state in the United States or any action brought against MCE Finance in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in the County of New York under the securities laws of the State of New York.

 

Walkers, our counsel as to Cayman Islands law, and Manuela António Law Office, our counsel as to Macau law, have advised us, respectively, that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands and Macau, respectively, would:

 

 

Walkers has further advised us that a judgment obtained in a foreign court will be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands without any re-examination of the merits (a) at common law, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, where the judgment is (i) final and conclusive and in respect of which the foreign court had jurisdiction over the defendant according to Cayman Islands conflict of law rules, (ii) either for a liquidated sum not in respect of penalties or taxes or a fine or similar fiscal or revenue obligations or, in certain circumstances, for in personam non-money relief, and which was neither obtained in a manner, nor is of a kind enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands and execution as if it were a judgment of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, or (b) by statute,

by registration in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands and execution as if it were a judgment of the Grand Court where the judgment is a judgment of a superior court of any state of the Commonwealth of Australia which is final and conclusive for a sum of money not in respect of taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine, penalty or revenue obligation, has not been wholly satisfied and which could be enforced by execution in that jurisdiction and is not set aside on the grounds that the country of the original court had no jurisdiction or the judgment was obtained by fraud or the enforcement of the judgment would be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands or on any other grounds.

 

Manuela António Law Office has advised further that a final and conclusive monetary judgment for a definite sum obtained in a federal or state court in the United States would be treated by the courts of Macau as a cause of action in itself so that no retrial of the issues would be necessary, provided that: (1) such court had jurisdiction in the matter and the defendant either submitted to such jurisdiction or was resident or carrying on business within such jurisdiction and was duly served with process; (2) due process was observed by such court, with equal treatment given to both parties to the action, and the defendant had the opportunity to submit a defense; (3) the judgment given by such court was not in respect of penalties, taxes, fines or similar fiscal or tax revenue obligations; (4) in obtaining judgment there was no fraud on the part of the person in whose favor judgment was given or on the part of the court; (5) recognition or enforcement of the judgment in Macau would not be contrary to public policy; (6) the proceedings pursuant to which judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice; and (7) any interest charged to the defendant does not exceed three times the official interest rate, which is currently 9.75% per annum, over the outstanding payment (whether of principal, interest fees or other amounts) due.

 

This prospectus, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, and any related prospectus supplement contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events, including our future operating results and conditions, our prospects and our future financial performance and condition, all of which are largely based on our current expectations and projections. All statements other than statements of historical fact in this prospectus, the documents incorporated by reference and any related prospectus supplement, are forward-looking statements. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Moreover, because we operate in a heavily regulated and evolving industry, may become highly leveraged, and operate in Macau, a market that has recently experienced extremely rapid growth and intense competition, new risk factors may emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of these factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement.

 

In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “potential,” “continue,” “is/are likely to” or other similar expressions. We have based the forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements relating to:

 

 

 

 

 

The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this prospectus. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we referenced in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

 

 

SUMMARY

	•	create a cross-platform sales and marketing department to promote all of our brands to potential customers throughout Asia in accordance with applicable laws;

	•	utilize special product offers, special events, tournaments and promotions to build and maintain relationships with our guests, in order to increase repeat visits and help fill capacity during lower-demand periods;

	•	refine our own customer loyalty programs to further build a database of repeat customers, which we closely modeled on Crown’s “Crown Club” program; and

	•	implement complimentary incentive programs and commission based programs with selected promoters to attract high-end customers.

	•	the early stage of operations of our business and properties;

	•	our dependence upon a limited number of properties for a substantial portion of our cash flow;

	•	our subsidiaries need a significant amount of cash to service their debt, and they may not generate sufficient cash flow to make scheduled debt payments;

	•	all of our operations are in Macau, which has certain political and economic risks that may lead to significant volatility and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations;

	•	the gaming industry in Macau is highly regulated;

	•	intense competition in Macau and elsewhere in Asia may cause us to lose, or to be unable to gain, market share and impact our ability to attract or retain suitably qualified management and personnel;

	•	our current indebtedness (which amounts to US$1.95 billion as of September 30, 2010) and any future indebtedness could impair our financial condition and further exacerbate the risks associated with our significant leverage;

	•	we are subject to and required to comply with many financing conditions and covenants, and a breach of certain conditions or covenants may result in our inability to rollover our loans or may result in our default under the terms and conditions of our financing and an acceleration of the repayment of such indebtedness, which would have a material adverse effect on the availability of our working capital;

	•	we extend credit, often unsecured, to some of our customers and we may not be able to collect such credit;

	•	gaming revenue is inherently subject to volatility as a result of win rate fluctuations; our focus on the rolling chip segment of the gaming market exposes us to a higher level of volatility and the winnings of our patrons could exceed our casino winnings;

	•	any outbreak of contagious disease in Macau and/or any of our properties may adversely affect visitation to Macau and/or our properties and may result in a material reduction of our revenue;

	•	restrictions on or conditions to travel in Macau could adversely impact the number of visitors from mainland China to our properties in Macau;

	•	MCE Finance is a holding company that will depend on payments under the Intercompany Note to provide it with funds to meet its obligations under the Notes; and

	•	there is no established trading market for the Exchange Notes and holders of Exchange Notes may not be able to sell the Exchange Notes at the price they paid or at all.

(1)	On May 17, 2010, MCE Finance on-lent to MPEL Investments under an intercompany note (the “Intercompany Note”) an aggregate amount necessary to reduce our indebtedness under the City of Dreams Project Facility. The Initial Notes and Guarantees were and the Exchange Notes and Guarantees will be secured by a first priority pledge of the Intercompany Note.
(2)	MPEL Nominee Three Limited and MPEL Nominee Two Limited are guarantors under the City of Dreams Project Facility, but as of the date of the indenture, are not guarantors of the Initial Notes or the Exchange Notes.
(3)	The shares are owned 96% by Melco Crown Gaming (Macau) Limited and 4% by MPEL Nominee Two Limited. Melco Crown (Cafe) Limited operates our non-gaming Mocha Club business.
(4)	Melco Crown (COD) Hotels Limited and Melco Crown (COD) Developments Limited operate our non-gaming City of Dreams business.
(5)	The shares of this company are owned 96% by Melco Crown Gaming (Macau) Limited and 4% by MPEL Nominee Two Limited.
(6)	The shares of this company are owned as to 99.98% by Melco Crown Gaming (Macau) Limited, 0.01% by MPEL Nominee Three Limited and 0.01% by MPEL Nominee Two Limited.

 

SUMMARY OF THE TERMS OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER

Background		On May 17, 2010, MCE Finance completed a private placement of the Initial Notes. In connection with that private placement, MCE Finance and the Guarantors entered into a registration rights agreement with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch International, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, ANZ Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Commerz Markets LLC, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, nabSecurities, LLC and UBS AG (collectively, the “initial purchasers”), in which MCE Finance and the Guarantors agreed, among other things, to conduct this exchange offer.
The Exchange Offer		MCE Finance is offering to exchange up to US$600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Initial Notes for up to US$600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes which have been registered under the Securities Act. Initial Notes may be tendered only in minimum denominations of US$2,000 of principal amount and integral multiples of US$1,000 in excess thereof.
Resale of the Exchange Notes		MCE Finance and the Guarantors have undertaken the exchange offer pursuant to the terms of the registration rights agreement entered into with the initial purchasers of the Initial Notes. See “The Exchange Offer” for further information regarding the exchange offer and resale of the Exchange Notes.
Consequences of Failure to Exchange the Initial Notes		You will continue to hold Initial Notes that remain subject to their existing transfer restrictions if:
		• you do not tender your Initial Notes; or
		• you tender your Initial Notes and they are not accepted for exchange.
		With some limited exceptions, we will have no obligation to register the Initial Notes after we consummate the exchange offer. See “The Exchange Offer — Terms of the Exchange Offer” and “The Exchange Offer — Consequence of Failure to Exchange.”
Expiration Date		The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on December 21, 2010 (the “expiration date”), unless we extend it, in which case expiration date will mean the latest date and time on which the exchange offer is extended.
Interest on the Exchange Notes		The Exchange Notes will accrue interest from the most recent date to which interest has been paid or provided for on the Initial Notes or, if no interest has been paid on the Initial Notes, from the date of original issue of the Initial Notes.
Conditions to the Exchange Offer		The exchange offer is subject to several customary conditions, some of which we may waive. See “The Exchange Offer — Conditions.”

Procedures for Tendering Initial Notes		If you wish to accept the exchange offer, you must submit required documentation and effect a tender of Initial Notes pursuant to the procedures for book-entry transfer (or other applicable procedures), all in accordance with the instructions described in this prospectus and in the relevant letter of transmittal. See “The Exchange Offer — Procedures for Tendering,” “The Exchange Offer — Book-Entry Transfer” and “The Exchange Offer — Guaranteed Delivery Procedures.”
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures		If you wish to tender your Initial Notes, but cannot properly do so prior to the applicable expiration date, you may tender your Initial Notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures set forth in “The Exchange Offer — Guaranteed Delivery Procedures.”
Withdrawal Rights		Tenders of Initial Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the expiration date. To withdraw a tender of Initial Notes, a written or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal must be received by the exchange agent at its address set forth in “The Exchange Offer — Exchange Agent” prior to 5:00 p.m. on the expiration date.
Acceptance of Initial Notes and Delivery of Exchange Notes		Except in some circumstances, any and all Initial Notes that are validly tendered in an exchange offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date will be accepted for exchange. The Exchange Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer will be delivered promptly following the expiration date. We may reject any and all Initial Notes that we determine have not been properly tendered or any Initial Notes the acceptance of which would, in the opinion of our counsel, be unlawful. With some limited exceptions, we will have no obligation to register the Initial Notes after we consummate the applicable exchange offer. See “The Exchange Offer — Terms of the Exchange Offer.”
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences		The exchange of an Initial Note for an Exchange Note pursuant to the exchange offer will not result in a taxable exchange to a beneficial owner of such Initial Note for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “Taxation — Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.”
Exchange Agent		The Bank of New York Mellon in Hong Kong is serving as the exchange agent in connection with the exchange offer.
Information Agent and Solicitation Agent		BNY Mellon Shareowner Services is serving as the information agent and the solicitation agent in connection with the exchange offer.

 

SUMMARY OF THE TERMS OF THE NOTES

	•	will be registered under the Securities Act and therefore will not be subject to restrictions on transfer;
	•	will not entitle their holders to registration rights;
	•	will bear a different CUSIP or ISIN number; and
	•	will be subject to terms relating to book-entry procedures and administrative terms relating to transfers that differ from those of the Initial Notes.

Issuer		MCE Finance Limited, currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Melco Crown Entertainment Limited.
Notes Offered		US$600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 10.25% Senior Notes due 2018.
Maturity		May 15, 2018.
Interest		10.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, with the first payment on November 15, 2010.
Ranking of Notes		The Initial Notes are and the Exchange Notes will be (1) general obligations of MCE Finance, (2) pari passu in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of MCE Finance, (3) senior in right of payment to any existing and future subordinated Indebtedness of MCE Finance, (4) effectively subordinated to all of MCE Finance’s existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt, and (5) unconditionally guaranteed by the Guarantors.
Guarantees		The Initial Notes are and the Exchange Notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior basis by the Parent and MPEL International with respect to the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, and all other amounts payable under the Notes and the indenture.
		The Initial Notes are and the Exchange Notes will be guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the Subsidiary Group Guarantors.
		The Initial Notes are and the Exchange Notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior subordinated basis by each of the Subsidiary Group Guarantors with respect to the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, and all other amounts payable under the Notes. A guarantee by a Subsidiary Group Guarantor may be released or replaced in certain circumstances. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness, the Notes and the Guarantees” and “Description of Exchange Notes — Note Guarantees.” We refer to the guarantees provided by the Parent, MPEL International and the Subsidiary Group Guarantors as the “Guarantees.”
Ranking of Guarantees		The guarantees provided by the Parent and MPEL International are and will be (1) general obligations of the Parent and MPEL International, (2) pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Parent and MPEL International, and

		(3) senior in right of payment to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Parent and MPEL International.
		The guarantees provided by the Subsidiary Group Guarantors are and will be (1) a general obligation of each such Subsidiary Group Guarantor, (2) subordinated in right of payment to indebtedness of such Subsidiary Group Guarantors under the City of Dreams Project Facility and under the SBGF Agreement, and (3) senior in right of payment to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness of such Subsidiary Group Guarantors.

Security		The Initial Notes and the related Guarantees are and the Exchange Notes and the related Guarantees will be secured by a first priority pledge of the Intercompany Note. (On May 17, 2010, MCE Finance on-lent to MPEL Investments under the Intercompany Note an aggregate amount necessary to reduce our indebtedness under the City of Dreams Project Facility. The face value of the Intercompany Note is US$600 million. Interest accrues on the Intercompany Note at a rate at least equal to the interest rate payable on the Notes, subject to certain adjustments. The Intercompany Note is repayable at the same time as the repayment in full or in part of amounts due under the Notes. See “Description of Exchange Notes — The Intercompany Note.”)

Optional Redemption		Prior to May 15, 2014, MCE Finance at its option may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus the applicable “make-whole” premium described in this prospectus plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the redemption date. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Optional Redemption.”
		At any time after May 15, 2014, MCE Finance at its option may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in “Description of Exchange Notes — Optional Redemption” plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the redemption date.
		At any time prior to May 15, 2013, MCE Finance may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of the Notes, with the net cash proceeds of one or more Equity Offerings at a redemption price of 110.25% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the redemption date. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Optional Redemption.”
Repurchase of Notes upon a Change of Control		Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, MCE Finance will make an offer to repurchase all outstanding Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the repurchase date. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Repurchase at the Option of Holders — Change of Control.”
Redemption for Taxation Reasons		Subject to certain exceptions and as more fully described herein, MCE Finance may redeem the Notes, in whole but not in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, together with

		accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the date fixed by MCE Finance for redemption, if MCE Finance or a Guarantor would become obliged to pay certain additional amounts as a result of certain changes in specified tax laws or certain other circumstances. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Redemption for Taxation Reasons.”
Gaming Redemption		The indenture grants MCE Finance the power to redeem the Notes if the gaming authority of any jurisdiction in which the Parent, MCE Finance or any of their respective subsidiaries conducts or proposes to conduct gaming requires that a person who is a holder or the beneficial owner of Notes be licensed, qualified or found suitable under applicable gaming laws and such holder or beneficial owner, as the case may be, fails to apply or become licensed or qualified within the required time period or is found unsuitable. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Gaming Redemption.”
Certain Covenants		The Notes, the indenture governing the Notes, and the Guarantees include certain limitations on MCE Finance and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
		• incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
		• make specified restricted payments;
		• issue or sell capital stock;
		• sell assets;
		• create liens;
		• enter into agreements that restrict the restricted subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends, transfer assets or make intercompany loans;
		• enter into transactions with shareholders or affiliates; and
		• effect a consolidation or merger.
		These covenants are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions described in “Descriptions of Notes — Certain Covenants.”
Exchange Offer; Registration Rights		Under a registration rights agreement executed as part of the offering of the Initial Notes, MCE Finance and the Parent have agreed to:
		• file this registration statement with the SEC within 90 days after the issue date of the Initial Notes;
		• use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement relating to the Notes to be declared effective no later than 180 days after the registration statement is filed; and
		• consummate the offer to exchange the Initial Notes within 30 business days after the effective date of the registration statement.
		Under certain circumstances, MCE Finance and the Guarantors will use all commercially reasonable efforts to file and to cause the SEC to declare effective a shelf registration statement with respect to the resale of the Initial Notes and MCE Finance and the Guarantors will use all commercially reasonable efforts to keep the shelf registration statement effective for up to one year after the date of the original issue

		of the Initial Notes. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages.”

Listing and Trading		The Initial Notes are listed and quoted on the SGX-ST. Approval in-principle has been received for the listing and quotation of the Exchange Notes on the Official List of the SGX-ST. The Exchange Notes will be traded on the SGX-ST in a minimum board lot size of S$200,000 (or its equivalent in foreign currencies) for so long as the Exchange Notes are listed on the SGX-ST and the rules of the SGX-ST so require.

Paying Agent		For so long as the Exchange Notes are listed on the SGX-ST and the rules of the SGX-ST so require, we will appoint and maintain a paying agent in Singapore, where the Exchange Notes may be presented or surrendered for payment or redemption, in the event that the Global Notes are exchanged for definitive Exchange Notes. In addition, in the event that the Global Notes are exchanged for definitive Exchange Notes, an announcement of such exchange shall be made by or on behalf of us through the SGX-ST and such announcement will include all material information with respect to the delivery of the definitive Exchange Notes, including details of the paying agent in Singapore, as long as the Exchange Notes are listed on the SGX-ST and the rules of the SGX-ST so require.

 

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

		Year Ended December 31,												Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In thousands of US$, except share and per share data and operating data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues		$	1,332,873			$	1,416,134			$	358,496			$	1,141,245			$	432,328
Total operating costs and expenses		$	(1,604,920	)		$	(1,414,960	)		$	(554,313	)		$	(1,142,479	)		$	(606,303	)
Operating (loss) income		$	(272,047	)		$	1,174			$	(195,817	)		$	(1,234	)		$	(173,975	)
Net loss		$	(308,461	)		$	(2,463	)		$	(178,151	)		$	(42,575	)		$	(179,284	)
Loss per share
— Basic and diluted		$	(0.210	)		$	(0.002	)		$	(0.145	)		$	(0.027	)		$	(0.131	)
— ADS(1)		$	(0.631	)		$	(0.006	)		$	(0.436	)		$	(0.080	)		$	(0.392	)
Shares used in calculating loss per share
— Basic and diluted			1,465,974,019				1,320,946,942				1,224,880,031				1,595,281,416				1,370,943,132

		As of December 31,												As of June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010
		(In thousands of US$)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	212,598			$	815,144			$	835,419			$	295,232
Restricted cash		$	236,119			$	67,977			$	298,983			$	194,274
Total assets		$	4,900,369			$	4,498,289			$	3,620,268			$	4,909,773
Total current liabilities		$	559,167			$	450,136			$	483,685			$	547,150
Total debts (include other long-term liabilities)(2)		$	1,819,473			$	1,566,467			$	625,899			$	1,965,611
Total liabilities		$	2,391,325			$	2,089,685			$	1,191,727			$	2,431,248
Total equity		$	2,509,044			$	2,408,604			$	2,428,541			$	2,478,525

(1)		Each ADS represents three ordinary shares.
(2)		Total debts include loans from shareholders, long-term debt and other long-term liabilities.

	•	On May 12, 2007, Altira Macau opened and became fully operational on July 14, 2007.

	•	On June 1, 2009, City of Dreams opened and progressively added to its operations with the opening of Grand Hyatt Macau in the fourth quarter of 2009.

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
Adjusted property EBITDA(1)(3) (in thousands of US$)		$	95,784			$	188,269			$	(702	)		$	185,924			$	14,510
Adjusted EBITDA(2)(3) (in thousands of US$)		$	55,756			$	157,025			$	(24,251	)		$	160,329			$	(2,537	)

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In thousands of US$)
Adjusted property EBITDA(1)(3)
Mocha Clubs		$	25,416			$	25,805			$	22,056			$	13,616			$	12,893
Altira Macau			13,702				162,487				(22,444	)			58,501				13,796
City of Dreams			56,666				(23	)			(314	)			113,807				(12,179	)
Total Adjusted property EBITDA		$	95,784			$	188,269			$	(702	)		$	185,924			$	14,510

(1)		“Adjusted property EBITDA” is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, other expenses (including pre-opening costs, share-based compensation, marketing expense relating to Altira Macau opening in May 2007, property charges and others, corporate and other expenses and non-operating income (expenses)).
(2)		“Adjusted EBITDA” is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, other expenses (including pre-opening costs, share-based compensation, marketing expense relating to Altira Macau opening in May 2007, property charges and others, and non-operating income (expenses)).

(3)		The Company changed the name of its segment operating measure from Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted property EBITDA effective for annual and interim periods commencing January 1, 2010. Additionally, the Company introduced a new performance measure, Adjusted EBITDA, which represents the Company’s total Adjusted property EBITDA less corporate and other expenses. Disclosures for previous periods are also presented on this basis for comparative purposes. Management uses Adjusted property EBITDA as its measure of the operating performance of its segments and to compare the operating performance of its properties with those of its competitors. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted property EBITDA are also presented as supplemental disclosures because management believes they are widely used to measure performance and as a basis for valuation of gaming companies. The Company also presents Adjusted property EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because it is used by some investors as a way to measure a company’s ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures, and meet working capital requirements. Gaming companies have historically reported Adjusted property EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to financial measures in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In thousands of US$)
Adjusted property EBITDA		$	95,784			$	188,269			$	(702	)		$	185,924			$	14,510
Corporate and other expenses			(40,028	)			(31,244	)			(23,549	)			(25,595	)			(17,047	)
Adjusted EBITDA			55,756				157,025				(24,251	)			160,329				(2,537	)
Pre-opening costs			(91,882	)			(21,821	)			(40,032	)			(6,982	)			(79,563	)
Depreciation and amortization			(217,496	)			(126,885	)			(113,932	)			(152,112	)			(81,541	)
Share-based compensation			(11,385	)			(6,855	)			(5,256	)			(2,503	)			(6,200	)
Marketing expense relating to Altira Macau opening			—				—				(11,959	)			—				—
Property charges and others			(7,040	)			(290	)			(387	)			34				(4,134	)
Interest and other non-operating expenses, net			(36,546	)			(5,107	)			16,212				(41,484	)			(5,175	)
Income tax credit (expense)			132				1,470				1,454				143				(134	)
Net loss		$	(308,461	)		$	(2,463	)		$	(178,151	)		$	(42,575	)		$	(179,284	)

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In thousands of US$)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		$	(112,257	)		$	(11,158	)		$	147,372			$	73,339			$	(49,559	)
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(1,143,639	)		$	(913,602	)		$	(972,620	)		$	(117,471	)		$	(554,260	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		$	653,350			$	904,485			$	1,076,671			$	126,766			$	444,307

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In billions of US$)
Altira Macau		$	37.5			$	62.3			$	14.4			$	19.4			$	18.8
City of Dreams			20.3				—				—				22.0				1.9
Total rolling chip volume		$	57.8			$	62.3			$	14.4			$	41.4			$	20.7

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(In millions of US$)
Altira Macau		$	273.0			$	353.2			$	240.6			$	147.6			$	149.5
City of Dreams			912.6				—				—				963.1				99.8
Total non-rolling chip volume		$	1,185.6			$	353.2			$	240.6			$	1,110.7			$	249.3

														Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,												June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2010				2009
		(%)
Altira Macau
Rolling chip table games			2.55				2.85				2.37				3.01				2.62
Non-rolling chip table games			16.0				14.6				16.5				16.6				13.8
City of Dreams
Rolling chip table games			2.65				—				—				2.60				0.79
Non-rolling chip table games			16.3				—				—				21.2				16.4

																						Six Months Ended
		Year Ended December 31,																				June 30,
		2009				2008				2007				2006				2005				2010
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges			—				0.08				—				—				—				0.07
Deficiency (In thousands of US$)			357,162				53,417				193,232				82,665				4,499				48,917

 

You should carefully consider the risks described below and other information contained in this prospectus before making an investment decision. If any of the possible events described below occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, we may not be able to satisfy our obligations under the Notes, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

 

Risks Relating to Our Early Stage of Operations

 

We are in an early stage of operations of our business and properties, and so we are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Our limited operating history may not serve as an adequate basis to judge our future operating results and prospects.

 

In significant respects we remain in an early phase of our business operations and there is limited historical information available about our company upon which you can base your evaluation of our business and prospects. In particular, Altira Macau and City of Dreams commenced operations in May 2007 and June 2009, respectively. The Mocha Club business, which we acquired in 2005, commenced operations in 2003. Melco Crown Gaming acquired its subconcession in September 2006 and previously did not have any direct experience operating casinos in Macau. As a result, you should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks, expenses and challenges that we will face as an early-stage company with limited experience operating gaming businesses in an intensely competitive market. Among other things, we have continuing obligations to satisfy and comply with conditions and covenants under the US$1.75 billion City of Dreams Project Facility so as to be able to continue to roll over existing revolving loans drawn down under the facility and to maintain the facility.

 

We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by early-stage companies, and those risks and difficulties may be heightened in a rapidly developing market such as the gaming market in Macau. Some of the risks relate to our ability to:

 

 

If we are unable to complete any of these tasks, we may be unable to operate our businesses in the manner we contemplate and generate revenues from such projects in the amounts and by the times we anticipate. We may also be unable to meet the conditions to draw on our existing or future financing facilities in order to fund various activities or may suffer a default under our existing or future financing facilities. If any of these events were to occur, it would cause a material adverse effect on our business and prospects, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.

Risks Relating to the Operation of Our Properties

 

Because we are and will be dependent upon a limited number of properties for a substantial portion of our cash flow, we are and will be subject to greater risks than a gaming company with more operating properties.

 

We are primarily dependent upon City of Dreams, Altira Macau and Mocha Clubs for our cash flow. Given that our operations are and will be conducted based on a small number of principal properties, we are and will be subject to greater risks than a gaming company with more operating properties due to the limited diversification of our businesses and sources of revenue.

 

Servicing the debt of our subsidiaries requires a significant amount of cash, and our subsidiaries may not generate a sufficient level of cash flow from their businesses to make scheduled payments on their debt.

 

Our subsidiaries’ ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance their indebtedness depends on our subsidiaries’ future performance, which is subject to certain economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005, our earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges. Our subsidiaries may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service their debt or make necessary capital repayments. If they are unable to generate such cash flow, our subsidiaries may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt, incurring additional indebtedness or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our subsidiaries’ ability to refinance their indebtedness will depend on the financial markets and their financial condition at such time. Our subsidiaries may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our subsidiaries’ debt obligations and a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our senior management, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lose their services or their other responsibilities cause them to be unable to devote sufficient time and attention to our company.

 

We place substantial reliance on the gaming, project development and hospitality industry experience and knowledge of the Macau market possessed by members of our senior management team, including our co-chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Lawrence Ho. The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team could hinder our ability to effectively manage our business and implement our growth and development strategies. Finding suitable replacements for Mr. Ho or other members of our senior management could be difficult, and competition for personnel of similar experience could be intense in Macau. We do not currently carry key person insurance on any members of our senior management team.

 

We have recruited a substantial number of new employees for each of our properties, and competition may limit our ability to attract or retain suitably qualified management and personnel.

 

We require extensive operational management and staff to operate both Altira Macau and City of Dreams. Accordingly, we undertook a major recruiting program before both openings. The pool of experienced gaming and other skilled and unskilled personnel in Macau is limited. Many of our new personnel occupy sensitive positions requiring qualifications sufficient to meet gaming regulatory and other requirements or are required to possess other skills for which substantial training and experience are needed. Moreover, competition to recruit and retain qualified gaming and other personnel is expected to continue. In addition, we are not currently allowed under Macau government policy to hire non-Macau resident dealers, croupiers and supervisors. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified individuals to operate our properties or that costs to recruit and retain such personnel will not increase significantly. The inability to attract and retain qualified employees and operational management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all losses that we may suffer from our operations. In addition, our insurance costs may increase and we may not be able to obtain the same insurance coverage in the future.

 

We currently have various insurance policies providing certain coverage typically required by gaming and hospitality operations in Macau. Such coverage includes property damage, business interruption and general liability. These insurance policies provide coverage that is subject to policy terms, conditions and limits. There is no assurance that we will be able to renew such insurance coverage on equivalent premium cost, terms, conditions and limits upon policy renewals. The cost of coverage may in the future become so high that we may be unable to obtain the insurance policies we deem necessary for the operation of our projects on commercially practicable terms, or at all, or we may need to reduce our policy limits or agree to certain exclusions from our coverage. We cannot assure you that any such insurance policies we may obtain will be adequate to protect us from material losses. If we incur loss, damage or liability for amounts exceeding the limits of our current or future insurance coverage, or for claims outside the scope of our current or future insurance coverage, our financial conditions and business operations could be materially and adversely affected. For example, certain casualty events, such as labor strikes, nuclear events, acts of war, loss of income due to cancellation of conventions or room reservations arising from fear of terrorism, contagious or infectious disease, deterioration or corrosion, insect or animal damage and pollution may not be covered under our policies. As a result, certain acts and events could expose us to significant uninsured losses. In addition to the damages caused directly by a casualty loss such as fire or natural disasters, we may suffer a disruption of our business as a result of these events or be subject to claims by third parties who may be injured or harmed. While we intend to carry business interruption insurance and general liability insurance, such insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and, in any event, may not be adequate to cover all losses that may result from such events.

 

Risks Relating to Our Business and Operations in Macau

 

Conducting business in Macau has certain political and economic risks that may lead to significant volatility and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

All of our operations are in Macau. Accordingly, our business development plans, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected by significant political, social and economic developments in Macau and China and by changes in government policies or changes in laws and regulations or the interpretations of these laws and regulations. In particular, our operating results may be adversely affected by:

 

 

Our operations in Macau are also exposed to the risk of changes in laws and policies that govern operations of Macau-based companies. Tax laws and regulations may also be subject to amendment or different interpretation and implementation, thereby adversely affecting our profitability after tax. Further, certain terms of our gaming subconcession may be subject to renegotiations with the Macau government in the future, including amounts we will be obligated to pay the Macau government in order to continue operations. Melco Crown Gaming’s obligations to make certain payments to the Macau government under the terms of its subconcession include a fixed annual premium per year and a variable premium depending on the number and type of gaming tables and gaming machines that we operate. The results of any renegotiations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

The Macau government granted us land leases for lands for Altira Macau and for City of Dreams. The opening and operation of the areas of City of Dreams for which construction is not yet completed will be subject to our obtaining an occupancy permit for such areas.

 

In January 2008, Former Secretary for Public Works and Transport of Macau, Mr. Ao Man Long, was convicted and sentenced to a prison term of 28.5 years on charges involving corruption, bribery, irregular financial activities and money laundering. Those being tried and convicted in cases connected with the conviction of Mr. Ao in 2008 are related to local companies to whom several major public works and services contracts were awarded and for whom certain licensing procedures were allegedly expedited. Mr. Lao Sio-Io was appointed the new Secretary for Transport and Public Works in March 2007. We cannot predict whether any ongoing or further prosecutions and investigations will adversely affect the functioning of the Macau Land, Public Works and Transports Bureau, any approvals that are pending before it, or for which applications may be made in the future (including with respect to our possible future projects), or will give rise to additional scrutiny or review of any approvals, including those for Altira Macau and City of Dreams, that were previously approved or granted through this Bureau and the Secretary for Transport and Public Works of Macau.

 

As we expect a significant number of patrons to come to our properties from China, general economic conditions and policies in China could have a significant impact on our financial prospects. A slowdown in economic growth and tightening of restrictions on travel imposed by China could adversely impact the number of visitors from China to our properties in Macau as well as the amounts they are willing to spend in our casinos, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations and financial condition.

 

The winnings of our patrons could exceed our casino winnings.

 

Our revenues are mainly derived from the difference between our casino winnings and the winnings of our casino patrons. Since there is an inherent element of chance in the gaming industry, we do not have full control over our winnings or the winnings of our casino patrons. If the winnings of our patrons exceed our casino winnings, we may record a loss from our gaming operations, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Theoretical win rates for our casino operations depend on a variety of factors, some beyond our control.

 

In addition to the element of chance, theoretical win rates are also affected by other factors, including players’ skill and experience, the mix of games played, the financial resources of players, the spread of table limits, the volume of bets placed by our players and the amount of time players spend on gambling — thus our actual win rates may differ greatly over short time periods, such as from quarter to quarter, and could cause our quarterly results to be volatile. Each of these factors, alone or in combination, have the potential to negatively impact our win rates, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Our gaming business is subject to cheating and counterfeiting.

 

All gaming activities at our table games are conducted exclusively with gaming chips which, like real currency, are subject to the risk of alteration and counterfeiting. We incorporate a variety of security and anti-counterfeit features to detect altered or counterfeit gaming chips. Despite such security features, unauthorized parties may try to copy our gaming chips and introduce, use and cash in altered or counterfeit gaming chips in our gaming areas. Any negative publicity arising from such incidents could also tarnish our reputation and may result in a decline in our business, financial condition and results of operation.

 

Our existing surveillance and security systems, designed to detect cheating at our casino operations, may not be able to detect all such cheating in time or at all, particularly if patrons collude with our employees. In addition, our gaming promoters or other persons could, without our knowledge, enter into betting arrangements directly with our casino patrons on the outcomes of our games of chance, thus depriving us of revenues.

Because we depend upon our properties in one market for all of our cash flow, we will be subject to greater risks than a gaming company that operates in more markets.

 

We are and will be primarily dependent upon City of Dreams, Altira Macau and Mocha Clubs for our cash flow. Given that our current operations are and will be conducted only at properties in Macau, we will be subject to greater risks than a gaming company with operating properties in several markets. These risks include:

 

 

Any of these conditions or events could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

Our gaming operations could be adversely affected by restrictions on the export of the Renminbi and limitations of the Pataca exchange markets.

 

Gaming operators in Macau are currently prohibited from accepting wagers in Renminbi, the currency of China. There are currently restrictions on the export of the Renminbi outside of mainland China, including to Macau. For example, Chinese traveling abroad are only allowed to take a total of RMB20,000 plus the equivalent of up to US$5,000 out of China. Restrictions on the export of the Renminbi may impede the flow of gaming customers from China to Macau, inhibit the growth of gaming in Macau and negatively impact our operations.

 

Our revenues in Macau are denominated in H.K. dollars and Patacas, the legal currency of Macau. Although currently permitted, we cannot assure you that H.K. dollars and Patacas will continue to be freely exchangeable into U.S. dollars. Although the exchange rate between the H.K. dollar and the U.S. dollar has been pegged since 1983 and the Pataca is pegged to the H.K. dollar, we cannot assure you that the H.K. dollar will remain pegged to the U.S. dollar and that the Pataca will remain pegged to the H.K. dollar. Also, because the currency market for Patacas is relatively small and undeveloped, our ability to convert large amounts of Patacas into U.S. dollars over a relatively short period of time may be limited. As a result, we may experience difficulty in converting Patacas into U.S. dollars.

 

Terrorism and the uncertainty of war, economic downturns and other factors affecting discretionary consumer spending and leisure travel may reduce visitation to Macau and harm our operating results.

 

The strength and profitability of our business depends on consumer demand for casino resorts and leisure travel in general. Changes in Asian consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could harm our business. Terrorist acts could have a negative impact on international travel and leisure expenditures, including lodging, gaming and tourism. We cannot predict the extent to which future terrorist acts may affect us, directly or indirectly. In addition to fears of war and future acts of terrorism, other factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, including general economic conditions, amounts of disposable consumer income, fears of recession and lack of consumer confidence in the economy, may negatively impact our business. Consumer demand for hotel,

casino resorts and the type of luxury amenities we currently offer and plan to offer in the future are highly sensitive to downturns in the economy. An extended period of reduced discretionary spending and/or disruptions or declines in airline travel could significantly harm our operations.

 

An outbreak of the highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by the H5N1 virus (avian flu or bird flu), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, or H1N1 virus (swine flu) or other contagious disease may have an adverse effect on the economies of certain Asian countries and may adversely affect our results of operations.

 

During 2004, large parts of Asia experienced unprecedented outbreaks of avian flu which, according to a report of the World Health Organization, or WHO, in 2004, placed the world at risk of an influenza pandemic with high mortality and social and economic disruption. As of October 18, 2010, the WHO confirmed a total of 302 fatalities in a total number of 507 cases reported to the WHO, which only reports laboratory confirmed cases of avian flu since 2003. In particular, Guangdong Province, PRC, which is located across the Zhuhai Border from Macau, has confirmed several cases of avian flu. Currently, fully effective avian flu vaccines have not yet been developed and there is evidence that the H5N1 virus are evolving so there can be no assurance that an effective vaccine can be discovered in time to protect against the potential avian flu pandemic. In the first half of 2003, certain countries in Asia experienced an outbreak of SARS, a highly contagious form of atypical pneumonia, which seriously interrupted economic activities and caused the demand for goods and services to plummet in the affected regions. More recently, in April 2009, there has been an outbreak of the Influenza A (H1N1) virus which originated in Mexico but has since spread globally including confirmed reports in Indonesia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and elsewhere in Asia. Indonesia also recently confirmed its first Influenza A (H1N1) linked death. The Influenza A (H1N1) virus is believed to be highly contagious and may not be easily contained. There can be no assurance that an outbreak of avian flu, SARS, H1N1 (swine flu) or other contagious disease or the measures taken by the governments of affected countries against such potential outbreaks, will not seriously interrupt our gaming operations or visitation to Macau, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The perception that an outbreak of avian flu, SARS or other contagious disease may occur again may also have an adverse effect on the economic conditions of countries in Asia.

 

Macau is susceptible to severe typhoons that may disrupt our operations.

 

Macau is susceptible to severe typhoons. Macau consists of a peninsula and two islands off the coast of mainland China. In the event of a major typhoon or other natural disaster in Macau, our properties and business may be severely disrupted and our results of operations could be adversely affected. Although we or our operating subsidiaries do carry insurance coverage with respect to these events, our coverage may not be sufficient to fully indemnify us against all direct and indirect costs, including loss of business, that could result from substantial damage to, or partial or complete destruction of, our properties or other damages to the infrastructure or economy of Macau.

 

Any fluctuation in the value of the H.K. dollar, U.S. dollar or Pataca may adversely affect our indebtedness, expenses and profitability.

 

Although the majority of our revenues are denominated in H.K. dollars, our expenses will be denominated predominantly in Patacas. In addition, a significant portion of our indebtedness and certain expenses is denominated in U.S. dollars, and the costs associated with servicing and repaying such debt will be denominated in U.S. dollars. The value of the H.K. dollar and Patacas against the U.S. dollar may fluctuate and may be affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Although the exchange rate between the H.K. dollar and the U.S. dollar has been pegged since 1983 and the Pataca is pegged to the H.K. dollar, we cannot assure you that the H.K. dollar will remain pegged to the U.S. dollar and that the Pataca will remain pegged to the H.K. dollar. We do not hedge our exposure to foreign currencies. Instead, we maintain a certain amount of our operating funds in the same currencies in which we have obligations, thereby reducing our exposure to currency fluctuations. Any significant fluctuations in the exchange rates between H.K. dollars or Patacas to U.S. dollars may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and financial condition. For example, to the extent that we are required to convert U.S. dollar financings into H.K. dollars or Patacas for our operations, fluctuations in the exchange rates between

H.K. dollars or Patacas against the U.S. dollar could have an adverse effect on the amounts we receive from the conversion.

 

Contract parties may not be able to secure adequate financing.

 

During the course of our business, we may enter into agreements with contract parties from which we may derive income in relation to the operation of gaming business. The inability of such contract parties to raise sufficient funds to develop and/or undertake the relevant project and gaming operations may affect our ability to derive such income as contracted for in the relevant agreements, and this may have an adverse impact on our business.

 

Our future construction projects will be subject to significant development and construction risks, which could have a material adverse impact on related project timetables, costs and our ability to complete the projects.

 

Our future construction projects will be subject to a number of risks, including:

 

 

The occurrence of any of these development and construction risks could increase the total costs, delay or prevent the construction or opening or otherwise affect the design and features of any future construction projects which we might undertake to complete. We cannot guarantee that our construction costs or total project costs for future projects will not increase beyond amounts initially budgeted.

 

Risks Relating to Our Operations in the Gaming Industry in Macau

 

Because our operations face intense competition in Macau and elsewhere in Asia, we may not be able to compete successfully and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.

 

The hotel, resort and casino businesses are highly competitive. Our competitors in Macau and elsewhere in Asia include many of the largest gaming, hospitality, leisure and resort companies in the world. Some of these current and future competitors are larger than we are and may have more diversified resources and greater access to capital to support their developments and operations in Macau and elsewhere.

We also compete to some extent with casinos located in other countries, such as Malaysia, North Korea, South Korea, the Philippines, Cambodia, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere in the world, including Las Vegas and Atlantic City in the United States. In addition, certain countries, such as Singapore have legalized casino gaming and others may in the future legalize casino gaming, including Japan, Taiwan and Thailand. Singapore awarded a casino license to Las Vegas Sands and a second casino license to Genting International Bhd. in 2006. Genting International Bhd. opened its casino on February 14, 2010 and Las Vegas Sands opened its casino on April 27, 2010. We also compete with cruise ships operating out of Hong Kong and other areas of Asia that offer gaming. The proliferation of gaming venues in Southeast Asia could also significantly and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Our regional competitors also include Crown’s Crown Casino Melbourne and Burswood Casino in Australia and other casino resorts that Melco and Crown may develop elsewhere in Asia outside Macau. Melco and Crown may develop different interests and strategies for projects in Asia under their joint venture which conflict with the interests of our business in Macau or otherwise compete with us for Asian gaming and leisure customers.

 

The Macau government could grant additional rights to conduct gaming in the future, which could significantly increase competition in Macau and cause us to lose or be unable to gain market share.

 

Melco Crown Gaming is one of six companies authorized by the Macau government to operate gaming activities in Macau. The Macau Government has announced that until further assessment of the economic situation in Macau there will not be any increase in the number of concessions or subconcessions. However, the policies and laws of the Macau government could change and the Macau government could grant additional concessions or subconcessions, and we could face additional competition which could significantly increase the competition in Macau and cause us to lose or be unable to maintain or gain market share.

 

Gaming is a highly regulated industry in Macau and adverse changes or developments in gaming laws or regulations could be difficult to comply with or significantly increase our costs, which could cause our projects to be unsuccessful.

 

Gaming is a highly regulated industry in Macau. Current laws, such as licensing requirements, tax rates and other regulatory obligations, including those for anti-money laundering, could change or become more stringent resulting in additional regulations being imposed upon the gaming operations in the Altira Macau casino, the City of Dreams casino, the Mocha Clubs, and other future projects including Macau Studio City and any other locations we may operate from time to time. Any such adverse developments in the regulation of the gaming industry could be difficult to comply with and could significantly increase our costs, which could cause our projects to be unsuccessful.

 

In September 2009, the Macau government set a cap on commission payments to gaming promoters of 1.25% of net rolling. This policy, which is being enforced as of December 2009, may limit our ability to develop successful relationships with gaming promoters and attract rolling chip patrons. Any failure to comply with these regulations may result in the imposition of liabilities, fines and other penalties and may materially and adversely affect our gaming subconcession. See “Regulation.”

 

Also the Macau government has announced its intention to raise the minimum age required for the entrance in casinos in Macau from 18 years of age to 21 years of age. As far as employment is concerned, it was further announced that this measure, when adopted, would allow casino employees to maintain their positions while in the process of reaching the minimum required age. If implemented, this could adversely affect our ability to engage sufficient staff for the operation of our projects.

 

The Macau government announced that the number of gaming tables operating in Macau should not exceed 5,500 by the end of 2012, which may adversely affect the future expansion of our business.

 

Also, the Macau government announced that it intends to restrict the ability of operators to open slot lounges, such as our Mocha Clubs, in residential areas. This policy may limit our ability to find new sites or maintain existing sites for the operation of our Mocha Clubs.

Current Macau laws and regulations concerning gaming and gaming concessions and matters such as prevention of money laundering are, for the most part, fairly recent and there is little precedent on the interpretation of these laws and regulations. We believe that our organizational structure and operations are currently in compliance in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations of Macau. However, these laws and regulations are complex and a court or an administrative or regulatory body may in the future render an interpretation of these laws and regulations or issue new or modified regulations that differ from our interpretation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Our activities in Macau are subject to administrative review and approval by various agencies of the Macau government. For example, our activities are subject to the administrative review and approval by the DICJ, the Health Department, Labor Bureau, Public Works Bureau, Fire Department, Finance Department and Macau Government Tourism Office. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain all necessary approvals, which may materially affect our business and operations. Macau law permits redress to the courts with respect to administrative actions. However, such redress is largely untested in relation to gaming regulatory issues.

 

Under Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession, the Macau government may terminate the subconcession under certain circumstances without compensation to Melco Crown Gaming, which would prevent it from operating casino gaming facilities in Macau and could result in defaults under our indebtedness and a partial or complete loss of our investments in our projects.

 

Under Melco Crown Gaming’s gaming subconcession, the Macau government has the right to unilaterally terminate our subconcession in the event of non-compliance by Melco Crown Gaming with its basic obligations under the subconcession and applicable Macau laws. If such a termination were to occur, Melco Crown Gaming would be unable to operate casino gaming in Macau. We would also be unable to recover the US$900 million consideration paid to Wynn Macau for the issue of the subconcession. For a list of termination events, please see the section headed “Regulation.” These events could lead to the termination of Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession without compensation to Melco Crown Gaming. In many of these instances, the subconcession contract does not provide a specific cure period within which any such events may be cured and, instead, we would rely on consultations and negotiations with the Macau government to remedy any such violation. Melco Crown Gaming has entered into a service agreement with New Cotai Entertainment (Macau) Limited and New Cotai Entertainment, LLC pursuant to which Melco Crown Gaming will operate the casino premises in its hotel casino resorts. If New Cotai Entertainment (Macau) Limited or other parties with whom we may, in the future, enter into similar agreements were to be found unsuitable or were to undertake actions that are inconsistent with Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession terms and requirements, we could suffer penalties, including the termination of the subconcession.

 

Based on information from the Macau government, proposed amendments to the legislation with regard to reversion of casino premises are being considered. We expect that if such amendments take effect, on the expiry or any termination of Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession, unless Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession were extended, only that portion of casino premises within our developments as then designated with the approval of the Macau government, including all gaming equipment, would revert to the Macau government automatically without compensation to us. Until such amendments come into effect, all of our casino premises and gaming equipment would revert automatically without compensation to us.

 

The subconcession contract contains various general covenants, obligations and other provisions as to which the determination of compliance is subjective. For example, compliance with general and special duties of cooperation, special duties of information, and with obligations foreseen for the execution of our investment plan may be subjective. We cannot assure you that we will perform such covenants in a way that satisfies the requirements of the Macau government and, accordingly, we will be dependent on our continuing communications and good faith negotiations with the Macau government to ensure that we are performing our obligations under the subconcession in a manner that would avoid any violations.

 

Under Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession, the Macau government is allowed to request various changes in the plans and specifications of our Macau properties and to make various other decisions and determinations that may be binding on us. For example, the Chief Executive of the Macau SAR has the right to require that we increase

Melco Crown Gaming’s share capital or that we provide certain deposits or other guarantees of performance with respect to the obligations of our Macau subsidiaries in any amount determined by the Macau government to be necessary. Melco Crown Gaming is limited in its ability to raise additional capital by the need to first obtain the approval of the Macau gaming and governmental authorities before raising certain debt or equity. Melco Crown Gaming’s ability to incur debt or raise equity may also be restricted by our existing and any future loan facilities. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these requirements or any other requirements of the Macau government or with the other requirements and obligations imposed by the subconcession.

 

Furthermore, pursuant to the subconcession contract, we are obligated to comply not only with the terms of that agreement, but also with laws, regulations, rulings and orders that the Macau government might promulgate in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with any such laws, regulations, rulings or orders or that any such laws, regulations, rulings or orders would not adversely affect our ability to construct or operate our Macau properties. If any disagreement arises between us and the Macau government regarding the interpretation of, or our compliance with, a provision of the subconcession contract, we will be relying on the consultation and negotiation process with the applicable Macau governmental agency described above. During any such consultation, however, we will be obligated to comply with the terms of the subconcession contract as interpreted by the Macau government.

 

Melco Crown Gaming’s failure to comply with the terms of its subconcession in a manner satisfactory to the Macau government could result in the termination of its subconcession. We cannot assure you that Melco Crown Gaming would always be able to operate gaming activities in a manner satisfactory to the Macau government. The loss of its subconcession would prohibit Melco Crown Gaming from conducting gaming operations in Macau which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and could result in defaults under our indebtedness and a partial or complete loss of our investments in our projects.

 

Currently, there is no precedent on how the Macau government will treat the termination of a concession or subconcession upon the occurrence of any of the circumstances mentioned above. Some of the laws and regulations summarized above have not yet been applied by the Macau government. Therefore, the scope and enforcement of the provisions of Macau’s gaming regulatory system cannot be fully assessed at this time.

 

Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession contract expires in 2022 and if we were unable to secure an extension of its subconcession in 2022 or if the Macau government were to exercise its redemption right in 2017, we would be unable to operate casino gaming in Macau.

 

Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession contract expires in 2022. Under the subconcession contract, beginning in 2017, the Macau government has the right to redeem the subconcession contract by providing us with at least one year’s prior notice. In the event the Macau government exercises this redemption right, we would be entitled to fair compensation or indemnity. The standards for the calculation of the amount of such compensation or indemnity would be determined based on the gross revenue generated by City of Dreams during the tax year immediately prior to the redemption, multiplied by the remaining term of the subconcession. We would not receive any further compensation (including for consideration paid to Wynn Macau for the subconcession). We cannot assure you that Melco Crown Gaming would be able to renew or extend its subconcession contract on terms favorable to us, or at all. We also cannot assure you that if Melco Crown Gaming’s subconcession were redeemed, the compensation paid would be adequate to compensate us for the loss of future revenues.

 

While Melco Crown Gaming will not initially be required to pay corporate income taxes on income from gaming operations under the subconcession, this tax exemption will expire in 2011, and it may not be extended.

 

The Macau government has granted to Melco Crown Gaming the benefit of a corporate tax holiday on gaming income in Macau for five years from 2007 to 2011. When this tax exemption expires, we cannot assure you that it will be extended beyond the expiration date.

 

Furthermore, the Macau government has granted to our subsidiary Altira Hotel Limited a declaration of utility purposes benefit, pursuant to which, for a period of 12 years, it is entitled to a vehicle and property tax holiday on any vehicles and immovable property that it owns or has been granted. Additionally, under the tax holiday, this

entity will also be allowed to double the maximum rates applicable regarding depreciation and reintegration for purposes of assessment of corporate income tax for the same period of time. We have applied for the same tax holidays for Melco Crown (COD) Hotels Limited in relation to the hotels at City of Dreams, but we cannot assure you that they will be granted by the Macau government on as favorable terms, or at all.

 

We extend credit to a portion of our customers, and we may not be able to collect gaming receivables from our credit customers.

 

We have conducted, and expect to continue to conduct, our table gaming activities at our casinos on a credit basis as well as a cash basis. This credit is often unsecured, as is customary in our industry. High-end patrons typically are extended more credit than patrons who wager lower amounts.

 

We may not be able to collect all of our gaming receivables from our credit customers. We expect that we will be able to enforce our gaming receivables only in a limited number of jurisdictions, including Macau and under certain circumstances Hong Kong. As most of our gaming customers are visitors from other jurisdictions, principally Hong Kong and the PRC, we may not have access to a forum in which we will be able to collect all of our gaming receivables because, among other reasons, courts of many jurisdictions do not enforce gaming debts. We may encounter forums that will refuse to enforce such debts, or we may be unable to locate assets in other jurisdictions against which to seek recovery of gaming debts. The collectability of receivables from international customers could be negatively affected by future business or economic trends or by significant events in the countries in which these customers reside. We may also in given cases have to determine whether aggressive enforcement actions against a customer will unduly alienate the customer and cause the customer to cease playing at our casinos. If we recognize large receivables from the credit extended to our customers, we could suffer a material adverse impact on our operating results if those receivables are deemed uncollectible. In addition, in the event a patron has been extended credit and has lost back to us the amount borrowed and the receivable from that patron is deemed uncollectible, Macau gaming tax will still be payable on the resulting gaming revenue notwithstanding our uncollectible receivable.

 

The current credit environment may limit availability of credit to gaming patrons and may negatively impact our revenue.

 

We conduct our table gaming activities at our casinos on a credit basis as well as a cash basis and our gaming promoters conduct their operations by extending credit to gaming patrons. The general economic downturn and turmoil in the financial markets have placed broad limitations on the availability of credit from credit sources as well as lengthening the recovery cycle of extended credit. Continued tightening of liquidity conditions in credit markets may constrain revenue generation and growth and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our business may face a higher level of volatility due to our focus on the rolling chip segment of the gaming market.

 

A significant proportion of our revenues is generated from the rolling chip segment of the gaming market. The revenues generated from the rolling chip segment of the gaming market are acutely volatile primarily due to high bets, and the resulting high winnings and losses. As a result, our business and results of operations and cash flows from operations may be more volatile from quarter to quarter than that of our competitors and may require higher levels of cage cash in reserve to manage this volatility.

 

We depend upon gaming promoters for a portion of our gaming revenue and if we are unable to establish, maintain and increase the number of successful relationships with gaming promoters, our ability to attract rolling chip patrons may be adversely affected.

 

Gaming promoters, who organize tours for rolling chip patrons to casinos in Macau, are responsible for a portion of our gaming revenues in Macau. With the rise in casino operations in Macau, the competition for relationships with gaming promoters has increased. As of June 30, 2010, we had agreements in place with approximately 68 gaming promoters. If we are unable to utilize and develop relationships with gaming promoters, our ability to grow our gaming revenues will be hampered and we will have to seek alternative ways to develop and

maintain relationships with rolling chip patrons, which may not be as profitable as relationships developed through gaming promoters.

 

We are impacted by the reputation and integrity of the parties with whom we engage in business activities and we cannot assure you that these parties will always maintain high standards or suitability throughout the term of our association with them. Failure to maintain such high standards or suitability may cause us and our shareholders to suffer harm to our and the shareholders’ reputation, as well as impaired relationships with, and possibly sanctions from, gaming regulators.

 

The reputation and integrity of the parties with whom we engage in business activities, in particular those who are engaged in gaming related activities, such as gaming promoters and developers and hotel operators that do not hold concessions or subconcessions and with which we have or may enter into services agreements, are important to our own reputation and to Melco Crown Gaming’s ability to continue to operate in compliance with its subconcession. For parties we deal with in gaming related activities, where relevant, the gaming regulators undertake their own probity checks and will reach their own suitability findings in respect of the activities and parties which we intend to associate with. In addition, we also conduct our internal due diligence and evaluation process prior to engaging such parties. Notwithstanding such regulatory probity checks and our own due diligence, we cannot assure you that the parties with whom we are associated will always maintain the high standards that gaming regulators and we require or that such parties will maintain their suitability throughout the term of our association with them. If we were to deal with any party whose probity was in doubt, this may reflect negatively on our own probity when assessed by the gaming regulators. Also, if a party associated with us falls below the gaming regulators’ suitability standards, we and our shareholders may suffer harm to our and the shareholders’ reputation, as well as impaired relationships with, and possibly sanctions from, gaming regulators with authority over our operations.

 

In particular, the reputations of the gaming promoters we deal with are important to our own reputation and Melco Crown Gaming’s ability to continue to operate in compliance with its subconcession. While we endeavor to ensure high standards of probity and integrity in the gaming promoters with whom we are associated, we cannot assure you that the gaming promoters with whom we are associated will always maintain such high standards. If we were to deal with a gaming promoter whose probity was in doubt or who failed to operate in compliance with Macau law consistently, this may be considered by regulators or investors to reflect negatively on our own probity and compliance records. If a gaming promoter falls below our standards of probity, integrity and legal compliance, we and our shareholders may suffer harm to our or their reputation, as well as worsened relationships with, and possibly sanctions from, gaming regulators with authority over our operations.

 

Since May 2008, China has imposed government restrictions on Chinese citizens traveling from mainland China to Macau. If China or other countries impose further restrictions on travel to Macau, our business or results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

We have made significant investments to develop our casino gaming and entertainment resort facilities and intend to make significant additional investments to develop Phase II at City of Dreams, based, in part, on our expectation of future visitor arrivals in Macau, particularly from mainland China. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, tourists from mainland China accounted for approximately 55.1%, 50.6% and 50.5%, respectively, of all visitors to Macau. If visitor arrivals from China and elsewhere fail to increase as anticipated or decrease further, our existing business and business prospects could be adversely affected.

 

Visitor arrivals from China and elsewhere may be negatively affected by visa and other travel restrictions from various countries. The Chinese government controls the flow of visitors from mainland China into Macau, as Chinese citizens must obtain visas to visit Macau. Under China’s Individual Visit Scheme (“IVS”), Chinese citizens from 49 urban centers and economically developed regions in the PRC may be eligible to obtain visas to visit Macau individually and not as part of a tour. The number of permits granted under the IVS has been gradually increasing since the system was introduced in 2003.

 

Between May and September 2008, the Chinese government imposed tighter restrictions on travel to Macau and may impose further restrictions in the future. In May and July 2008, the Chinese government readjusted its visa

policy toward Macau and limited the number of visits that some mainland Chinese citizens may make to Macau in a given time period. In September 2008, it was publicly announced that mainland Chinese citizens with only a Hong Kong visa and not a Macau visa could no longer enter Macau from Hong Kong. In addition, in May 2009, China also began to restrict the operation of “below-cost” tour groups involving low up-front payments and compulsory shopping. These restrictions had a material adverse effect on the number of visitors to Macau from mainland China.

 

Visitor arrivals in Macau decreased by 5.2% to 21.8 million in 2009, compared to 22.9 million in 2008. Further restrictions on travel from China or other countries to Macau or any increase in prices of tours to Macau, as a result of new regulations on travel agencies or otherwise, may reduce the number of visitors to Macau in general and to our properties in particular.

 

We cannot assure you that anti-money laundering policies that we have implemented, and compliance with applicable anti-money laundering laws, will be effective to prevent our casino operations from being exploited for money laundering purposes.

 

Macau’s free port, offshore financial services and free movements of capital create an environment whereby Macau’s casinos could be exploited for money laundering purposes. We have implemented anti-money laundering policies in compliance with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations in Macau. However, we cannot assure you that any such policies will be effective in preventing our casino operations from being exploited for money laundering purposes, including from jurisdictions outside of Macau. In the normal course of business, we expect to be required by regulatory authorities from Macau and other jurisdictions to attend meetings and interviews from time to time to discuss our operations as they relate to anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Any incidents of money laundering, accusations of money laundering or regulatory investigations into possible money laundering activities involving us, our employees, our gaming promoters or our customers could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, cash flows, financial condition, prospects and results of operations.

 

If Macau’s transportation infrastructure does not adequately support the development of Macau’s gaming and leisure industry, visitation to Macau may not increase as currently expected, which may adversely affect our projects.

 

Macau consists of a peninsula and two islands and is connected to China by two border crossings. Macau has an international airport and connections to China and Hong Kong by road, ferry and helicopter. To support Macau’s planned future development as a gaming and leisure destination, the frequency of bus, plane and ferry services to Macau will need to increase. While various projects are under development to improve Macau’s internal and external transportation links, these projects may not be approved, financed or constructed in time to handle the projected increase in demand for transportation or at all, which could impede the expected increase in visitation to Macau and adversely affect our projects.

 

Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure and Ownership

 

Our existing shareholders will have a substantial influence over us and their interests in our business may be different than yours.

 

Melco and Crown together own the substantial majority of our outstanding shares, with each beneficially holding approximately 33.5% of our outstanding ordinary shares and ordinary shares represented by ADSs (exclusive of any ordinary shares represented by ADSs held by the SPV) as of November 5, 2010. Melco and Crown have entered into a shareholders deed regarding the voting of their shares of our company under which each will agree to, among other things, vote its shares in favor of three nominees to our board designated by the other.

 

As a result, Melco and Crown, if they act together, will have the power, among other things, to elect directors to our board, including six of ten directors who are designated nominees of Crown and Melco, appoint and change our management, affect our legal and capital structure and our day-to-day operations, approve material mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and other business combinations and approve any other material transactions and financings. These actions may be taken in many cases without the approval of independent directors or other shareholders and the interests of these shareholders may conflict with your interests as holders of the Notes. In addition, if Melco or Crown provides shareholder support to us in the form of shareholder loans or provides credit

support by guaranteeing our obligations, they may become our creditors with different interests than shareholders with only equity interests in us or you as holders of the Notes.

 

Business conducted through joint ventures involves certain risks.

 

We were initially formed as a 50/50 joint venture between Melco and PBL as their exclusive vehicle to carry on casino, gaming machine and casino hotel operations in Macau. Subsequently, Crown acquired all the gaming businesses and investments of PBL, including PBL’s investment in our company. As a joint venture controlled by Melco and Crown, there are special risks associated with the possibility that Melco and Crown may: (1) have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours or that are inconsistent with each other’s interests or goals, causing disagreement between them or between them and us which harms our business; (2) have operations and projects elsewhere in Asia that compete with our businesses in Macau and for available resources and management attention within the joint venture group; (3) take actions contrary to our policies or objectives; (4) be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the relevant joint venture or shareholders’ deed; or (5) have financial difficulties. In addition, there is no assurance that the laws and regulations relating to foreign investment in Melco’s or Crown’s governing jurisdictions will not be altered in such a manner as to result in a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

 

Melco and Crown may pursue additional casino projects in Asia, which, along with their current operations, may compete with our projects in Macau which could have material adverse consequences to us and your interests.

 

Melco and Crown may take action to construct and operate new gaming projects located in other countries in the Asian region, which, along with their current operations, may compete with our projects in Macau and could have adverse consequences to us and your interests. We could face competition from these other gaming projects. We also face competition from regional competitors, which include Crown’s Crown Casino in Melbourne, Australia and Burswood Casino in Perth, Australia. We expect to continue to receive significant support from both Melco and Crown in terms of their local experience, operating skills, international experience and high standards. Specifically, we have support arrangements with Melco and Crown under which they provide us technical expertise in connection with the on-going development of City of Dreams and the operations of the Altira Macau, City of Dreams and the Mocha Clubs businesses. Should Melco or Crown decide to focus more attention on casino gaming projects located in other areas of Asia that may be expanding or commencing their gaming industries, or should economic conditions or other factors result in a significant decrease in gaming revenues and number of patrons in Macau, Melco or Crown may make strategic decisions to focus on their other projects rather than us, which could adversely affect our growth. We cannot guarantee you that Melco and Crown will make strategic and other decisions which do not adversely affect our business and the trading price of the Notes.

 

Changes in our share ownership, including a change of control or a change in the amounts or relative percentages of our shares owned by Melco and Crown, could result in our inability to draw loans or events of default under our indebtedness or could require MCE Finance to make an offer to repurchase the Notes.

 

The City of Dreams Project Facility includes provisions under which we may suffer an event of default or incur an obligation to prepay the facility in full upon the occurrence of a change of control with respect to Melco Crown Gaming, or a decline in the aggregate indirect holdings of Melco Crown Gaming shares by Melco and Crown, below certain thresholds. Under the terms of the Notes, a Change of Control in connection with a decrease of the Sponsors holdings must be accompanied by a ratings decline in order to trigger a Change of Control. Furthermore, under the terms of the Notes, MCE Finance must offer to repurchase the Notes upon the occurrence of a Change of Control at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the date of redemption. See “— Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness, the Notes and the Guarantees — MCE Finance may not be able to repurchase the Notes upon a Change of Control.” Any occurrence of these events could be outside our control and could result in defaults and cross-defaults which cause the termination and acceleration of up to all of our credit facilities (or the Notes) and potential enforcement of

remedies by our lenders, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Crown’s investment in our company is subject to regulatory review in several jurisdictions and if regulators in those jurisdictions were to find that we, Crown or Melco failed to comply with certain regulatory requirements and standards, then Crown maybe required to withdraw from the joint venture.

 

Crown, through wholly owned subsidiaries, owns and operates the Crown Casino in Melbourne, Australia and the Burswood Casino in Perth, Australia. Crown’s wholly owned subsidiaries hold casino licenses issued by the States of Victoria and Western Australia in Australia.

 

Crown, through a 50% owned joint venture subsidiary, owns and operates three casinos in the United Kingdom. The joint venture owns a 50% interest in a fourth casino in the United Kingdom.

 

Under a previously announced Preferred Purchase Agreement, Crown has been required to be approved by gaming regulators in the State of Nevada and is undergoing approval in the State of Pennsylvania in the United States in relation to an investment in Cannery Casino Resorts LLC which owns and operates casinos in those states.

 

In all jurisdictions in which Crown, or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries, holds a gaming license or Crown has a significant investment in a company which holds gaming licenses, gaming regulators are empowered to investigate associates, including business associates of Crown to determine whether the associate is of good repute and of sound financial resources. If, as a result of such investigation, the relevant gaming regulator determines that, by reason of its association, Crown has ceased to be suitable to hold a gaming license or to hold a substantial investment in the holder of a gaming license then the relevant gaming regulator may direct Crown to terminate its association or risk losing its gaming license or approval to invest in the holder of a gaming license in the relevant jurisdiction.

 

If actions by us or our subsidiaries or by Melco or Crown fail to comply with the regulatory requirements and standards of the jurisdictions in which Crown owns or operates casinos or in which companies in which Crown holds a substantial investment own or operate casinos or if there are changes in gaming laws and regulations or the interpretation or enforcement of such laws and regulations in such jurisdictions, then Crown may be required to withdraw from its joint venture with Melco or limit its involvement in one or more aspects of our gaming operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Withdrawal by Crown from its joint venture with Melco could cause the failure of conditions to drawing loans under our credit facilities or the occurrence of events that default under our credit facilities or as contemplated by our founders under their joint venture agreement.

 

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness, the Notes and the Guarantees

 

Our current, projected and potential future indebtedness could impair our financial condition, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our significant leverage.

 

Exclusive of the Notes, we have incurred and expect to incur, based on current budgets and estimates, secured long-term indebtedness, including the following:

 

 

Our significant secured indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

 

 

 

Any of these or other consequences or events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to satisfy our other debt obligations, including the Notes.

 

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations.

 

Our ability to make scheduled payments due on our existing and anticipated debt obligations, including the Notes, and to fund planned capital expenditure and development efforts will depend on our ability to generate cash. We will require generation of sufficient operating cash flow from our projects to service our current and future projected indebtedness. Our ability to obtain cash to service our existing and projected debt is subject to a range of economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our existing and projected debt obligations, including the Notes, in which case, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that any refinancing or restructuring would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales or the amount of proceeds that would be realized from those sales. In addition, the terms of the indenture and/or the terms of our other indebtedness may limit our ability to pursue any of these measures. We cannot assure you that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or would be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments then in effect. Our failure to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our existing and projected debt obligations, including the Notes, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The terms of the City of Dreams Project Facility may restrict our current and future operations and harm our ability to complete our projects and grow our business operations to compete successfully against our competitors.

 

The City of Dreams Project Facility and associated facility and security documents that Melco Crown Gaming has entered into also contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on Melco Crown Gaming and its subsidiaries, and therefore, effectively, on us. The covenants in the City of Dreams Project Facility restrict or limit, among other things, our and our subsidiaries’ ability to:

 

 

 

In addition, the restrictions under the City of Dreams Project Facility contain financial covenants, including requirements that we satisfy certain tests or ratios for the twelve month period commencing January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2010, and thereafter for each successive twelve month period ending on the last day of each quarter of our financial year, such as:

 

 

They also provide that, should a Change of Control (as defined in the City of Dreams Project Facility Agreement) occur, the Facility will be cancelled and all amounts outstanding thereunder become immediately due and payable. We have made certain amendments to the City of Dreams Project Facility, which became effective on or about the date of the indenture. See “Description of Other Material Indebtedness — Additional Information.”

 

These covenants may restrict our ability to operate and restrict our ability to incur additional debt or other financing we may require, and impede our growth.

 

Drawdown or rollover of advances under our debt facilities involve satisfaction of extensive conditions precedent and our failure to satisfy such conditions precedent will result in our inability to access or roll over loan advances under such facilities. We do not guarantee that we are able to satisfy all conditions precedent under our current or future debt facilities.

 

Our current and future debt facilities, including the City of Dreams Project Facility, require and will require satisfaction of extensive conditions precedent prior to the advance or rollover of loans under such facilities. The satisfaction of such conditions precedent may involve actions of third parties and matters outside of our control, such as government consents and approvals. If there is a breach of any terms or conditions of our debt facilities or other obligations and it is not cured or capable of being cured, such conditions precedent will not be satisfied. The inability to draw down or roll over loan advances in any debt facility may result in a funding shortfall in our operations and we may not be able to fulfill our obligations as planned; such events may result in an event of default under such debt facility and may also trigger cross default in our other obligations and debt facilities. We do not guarantee that all conditions precedent to draw down or roll over loan advances under our debt facilities will be satisfied in a timely manner or at all. If we are unable to draw down or roll over loan advances under any current or future facility, we may have to find a new group of lenders and negotiate new financing terms or consider other financing alternatives. If required, it is possible that new financing would not be available or would have to be procured on substantially less attractive terms, which could damage the economic viability of the relevant development project. The need to arrange such alternative financing would likely also delay the construction and/or operations of our future projects or existing properties, which would affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our or our subsidiaries’ indebtedness, including failure as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, operating results and our financial condition.

 

If there were an event of default under one of our or our subsidiaries’ debt facilities, including under the indenture governing the Notes, the holders of the debt on which we defaulted could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to become due and payable immediately. In addition, any event of default or declaration of acceleration under one debt facility could result in an event of default under one or more of our other debt instruments, with the result that all of our debt would be in default and accelerated. We cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt facilities, including under the indenture governing the Notes, either upon maturity or if accelerated upon an event of default, or that we would be able to refinance or restructure the payments on those debt facilities. Further, if we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness at our subsidiaries that own or operate our properties, the lenders under those debt facilities could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness, which will constitute substantially all the assets and shares of our subsidiaries. In that event, any proceeds received upon a realization of the collateral would be applied first to amounts due under those debt instruments. The value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay all of our indebtedness, including the Notes.

 

Recent turmoil in the credit markets taken together with the role of the credit agencies may affect our ability to maintain current financing or obtain future financing which could result in delays in our project development schedule and could impact our ability to generate revenue from operations at our present and future projects.

 

The recent turmoil in the credit markets may adversely affect our ability to maintain our current debt facility and to obtain additional or future financing for our operations and our current and future projects. If we are unable to maintain our current debt facility or obtain suitable financing for our operations and our current or future projects, this could adversely impact our existing operations, or cause delays in, or prevent completion of, the development of future projects. This may limit our ability to operate and expand our business and may adversely impact our ability to generate revenue. The costs incurred by any new financing may be greater than anticipated due to the recent turmoil in the credit markets.

 

MCE Finance may not be able to repurchase the Notes upon a Change of Control.

 

MCE Finance must offer to purchase the Notes upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Repurchase at the Option of Holders — Change of Control.”

 

The source of funds for any such purchase would be our available cash or third-party financing. However, MCE Finance may not have enough available funds at the time of the occurrence of any Change of Control to make purchases of outstanding Notes. MCE Finance’s failure to make the offer to purchase or purchase the outstanding Notes would constitute an Event of Default under the Notes. The Event of Default may, in turn, constitute an event of default under other indebtedness, any of which could cause the related debt to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods. If our other debt were to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to purchase the Notes and repay the debt.

 

In addition, the definitions of Change of Control for purposes of the indenture governing the Notes do not necessarily afford protection for the holders of the Notes in the event of some highly leveraged transactions, including certain acquisitions, mergers, refinancings, restructurings or other recapitalizations, although these types of transactions could increase our indebtedness or otherwise affect our capital structure or credit ratings. The definitions of Change of Control for purposes of the indenture governing the Notes also include a phrase relating to the sale of “all or substantially all” of its assets. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase “substantially all,” there is no precise established definition under applicable law. Accordingly, MCE Finance’s obligation to make an offer to purchase the Notes, and the ability of a holder of the Notes to require MCE Finance to purchase its Notes pursuant to the offer as a result of a highly-leveraged transaction or a sale of less than all of its assets may be uncertain.

MCE Finance may, in its discretion, require holders and beneficial owners of Notes to dispose of their Notes, or MCE Finance may redeem the Notes, due to regulatory considerations.

 

The indenture grants MCE Finance the power to redeem the Notes if the gaming authority of any jurisdiction in which the Parent, MCE Finance or any of their respective subsidiaries conducts or proposes to conduct gaming requires that a person who is a holder or the beneficial owner of Notes be licensed, qualified or found suitable under applicable gaming laws and such holder or beneficial owner, as the case may be, fails to apply or become licensed or qualified within the required time period or is found unsuitable.

 

Under the foregoing circumstances, pursuant to the indenture, if such person fails to apply or become licensed or qualified or is found unsuitable, MCE Finance has the right, at its option:

 

(1) to require such person to dispose of its Notes or beneficial interest therein within 30 days of receipt of notice of MCE Finance’s election or such earlier date as may be requested or prescribed by such gaming authority; or

 

(2) to redeem such Notes, which redemption may be less than 30 days following the notice of redemption if so requested or prescribed by the applicable gaming authority, at a redemption price equal to:

 

(a) the lesser of:

 

(1) the person’s cost, plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the earlier of the redemption date or the date of the finding of unsuitability or failure to comply; and

 

(2) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the earlier of the redemption date or the date of the finding of unsuitability or failure to comply; or

 

(b) such other amount as may be required by applicable law or order of the applicable gaming authority.

 

MCE Finance is not responsible for any costs or expenses any holder of Notes may incur in connection with its application for a license, qualification or a finding of suitability. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Gaming Redemption.”

 

Should MCE Finance default on the Notes, or the Guarantors default on their Guarantees, a Note holder’s right to receive payments on the Notes or the Guarantees may be adversely affected by the insolvency laws of the jurisdiction of incorporation of the defaulting Issuer or Guarantors.

 

MCE Finance is incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and it is likely that an insolvency proceeding relating to MCE Finance, even if brought in the United States, would involve Cayman Islands insolvency laws, the procedural and substantive provisions of which may differ from comparable provisions of United States federal bankruptcy law. In addition, the insolvency laws of the jurisdictions of incorporation of the Guarantors, such as Macau, may also differ from the laws of the United States or other jurisdictions with which the holders of the Notes are familiar. The insolvency laws of the Cayman Islands, Macau or another jurisdiction of incorporation of a defaulting Guarantor may vary as to treatment of creditors and may contain prohibitions on the ability of the Issuer or the Guarantors to pay any debts existing at the time of the insolvency.

 

You may have difficulty enforcing judgments obtained against us.

 

The Parent, MCE Finance and several of the Guarantors are Cayman Islands exempted companies and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Other than MPEL (Delaware) LLC, a Delaware company, the remaining Guarantors are incorporated in Macau. All of our current operations and administrative and corporate functions are conducted in Macau and Hong Kong. In addition, substantially all of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in Cayman

Islands, Macau and Hong Kong courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors, most of whom are not residents in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands, Macau or Hong Kong would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state. In addition, it is uncertain whether such Cayman Islands, Macau or Hong Kong courts would be competent to hear original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, Macau or Hong Kong against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state.

 

If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements or the indenture governing the Notes, there could be a default under the terms of these agreements or the indenture governing the Notes, which could cause repayment of our debt to be accelerated.

 

If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in the indenture governing the Notes or our current or future debt obligations and other agreements, there could be a default under the terms of these agreements. In the event of a default under these agreements, the holders of the debt could terminate their commitments to lend to us, accelerate repayment of the debt and declare all amounts borrowed due and payable or terminate the agreements, as the case may be. Furthermore, some of our debt agreements, including the indenture governing the Notes, contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. As a result, our default under one debt agreement may cause the acceleration of repayment of debt, including the Notes, or result in a default under our other debt agreements, including the indenture governing the Notes. If any of these events occur, we cannot assure you that our assets and cash flow would be sufficient to repay in full all of our indebtedness, or that we would be able to find alternative financing. Even if we could obtain alternative financing, we cannot assure you that it would be on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us.

 

Our operations are restricted by the terms of the Notes, which could limit our ability to plan for or to react to market conditions or meet our capital needs.

 

The indenture governing the Notes includes a number of significant restrictive covenants. These covenants restrict, among other things, the ability of MCE Finance and its subsidiaries to:

 

 

These covenants could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our capital needs. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some of our operations and growth plans to maintain compliance.

 

There is no established trading market for the Exchange Notes and holders of Exchange Notes may not be able to sell the Exchange Notes at the price that holders paid or at all; the liquidity and market price of the Exchange Notes following this exchange offer may be volatile.

 

There is no established trading market for the Exchange Notes. Approval in-principle has been received for the listing and quotation of the Exchange Notes on the Official List of the SGX-ST. However, we can make no assurances that MCE Finance will be able to obtain or maintain such listing or that, if listed, a trading market will develop. Lack of a liquid, active trading market for the Exchange Notes may adversely affect the price of the

Exchange Notes or may otherwise impede a holder’s ability to dispose of the Exchange Notes. As a result, we can make no assurances as to the liquidity of any trading market for the Exchange Notes.

 

We also can make no assurances that holders of the Exchange Notes will be able to sell their Exchange Notes at a particular time or that the prices that such holders receive when they sell the Exchange Notes will be equal to or more than the prices they paid for the Exchange Notes. Future trading prices of the Exchange Notes will depend on many factors, including the following:

 

 

Since the second quarter of 2008, the international credit markets have experienced periods of significant illiquidity and the prices of securities traded in the international capital markets have experienced substantial volatility and declines. Furthermore, historically, the market for debt by Asian issuers has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of such securities. The market for the Exchange Notes may be subject to similar volatility or disruptions, which may have an adverse effect on holders of the Exchange Notes.

 

The Notes will initially be held in book-entry form, and therefore you must rely on the procedures of relevant clearing systems to exercise any rights and remedies.

 

The Notes will initially only be issued in global certificated form and held through the Depositary Trust Company, or DTC, and its participants, including Euroclear Bank S.A./N.A. (“Euroclear”) and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme, Luxembourg (“Clearstream”). Interests in the Global Notes (as defined in “Description of Exchange Notes — Book-Entry, Delivery and Form”) representing the Notes will trade in book-entry form only, and Notes in definitive registered form, or definitive registered Notes, will be issued in exchange for book-entry interests only in very limited circumstances. Owners of book-entry interests will not be considered owners or holders of Notes. The custodian for DTC will be the sole registered holder of the Global Notes. Payments of principal, interest and other amounts owing on or in respect of the Global Notes will be made to the paying agent who will make payments to DTC. Thereafter, these payments will be credited to accounts of participants (including Euroclear and Clearstream) that hold book-entry interests in the Global Notes and credited by such participants to indirect participants. After payment to the custodian for DTC, MCE Finance will have no responsibility or liability for the payment of interest, principal or other amounts to the owners of book-entry interests. Accordingly, if you own a book-entry interest, you must rely on the procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, and if you are not a participant in DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream on the procedures of the participant through which you own your interest, to exercise any rights and obligations of a holder of Notes under the indenture.

 

Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the indenture, unless and until definitive registered Notes are issued in respect of all book-entry interests, if you own a book-entry interest, you will be restricted to acting through DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream. The procedures to be implemented through DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream may not be adequate to ensure the timely exercise of rights under the Notes. See “Description of Exchange Notes and Guarantees — Book-Entry, Delivery and Form.”

The Guarantees may be challenged under applicable insolvency or fraudulent transfer laws, which could impair the enforceability of the Guarantees.

 

Although laws differ among jurisdictions, under bankruptcy laws, fraudulent transfer laws, insolvency or similar laws, a guarantee could be voided if, among other things, the guarantor, at the time it incurred the indebtedness evidenced by, or when it gives, its guarantee:

 

 

The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing will vary depending on the laws of the jurisdiction which are being applied. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent at a particular time if it were unable to pay its debts as they fell due or if the sum of its debts was then greater than all of its property at a fair valuation or if the present fair saleable value of its assets was then less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities in respect of its existing debt as it became absolute and matured or abandonment of the head office of the guarantor or dissipation of assets, fraudulent incurrence of credits or any other abusive procedure that reveals the intention of the guarantor not to comply with its obligations.

 

In addition, a guarantee may be subject to review under applicable insolvency or fraudulent transfer laws in certain jurisdictions or subject to a lawsuit by or on behalf of creditors of the guarantors. In such case, the analysis set forth above would generally apply, except that the guarantee could also be subject to the claim that, since the guarantee was not incurred for the benefit of the guarantor, the obligations of the guarantor thereunder were incurred for less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration.

 

Furthermore, and specifically with regard to Macau law, in general a Guarantee may be challenged if:

 

 

In addition, under Macau bankruptcy and insolvency laws, a Guarantee may be voided in whole or in part by a Macau court on the grounds that:

 

 

Further, under Macau law, a Guarantor would be considered bankrupt or insolvent if it were unable to pay its debts as they fall due, if the members of its corporate bodies evade without appointing suitable substitutes, it

abandons its head office or if it dissipates its assets, incurs fraudulently in credits or in any other abusive procedure that reveals the intention of the Guarantor not to punctually comply with its obligations.

 

Under Macau law, if a court declares a Guarantor bankrupt or insolvent, all its obligations will become immediately due and payable and interest and other charges thereon will cease to accrue. Further, after the declaration of bankruptcy or insolvency, creditors shall not be entitled to exercise any right to set off against a Guarantor.

 

If a court voided a Guarantee, subordinated such Guarantee to other indebtedness of the Guarantor, or held the Guarantee unenforceable for any other reason, holders of the Notes would cease to have a claim against that Guarantor based upon such Guarantee and would solely be creditors of us and any Guarantor whose Guarantee was not voided or held unenforceable. We cannot assure you that, in such an event, after providing for all prior claims, there would be sufficient assets to satisfy the claims of the holders of the Notes.

 

The value of the collateral may not be sufficient to satisfy MCE Finance’s obligations under the Notes and the Guarantors’ obligations under the Guarantees.

 

The Notes and the Guarantees pursuant to the Initial Notes are and pursuant to the Exchange Notes will be secured by a first priority pledge of the Intercompany Note. The amount of proceeds that ultimately would be distributed in respect of the Notes upon any enforcement action or otherwise may not be sufficient to satisfy MCE Finance’s obligations under the Notes and the Guarantors’ obligations under the Guarantees. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any enforcement action would be successful.

 

MCE Finance is a holding company which will depend on payments under the Intercompany Note to provide it with funds to meet its obligation under the Notes.

 

MCE Finance is a holding company with no material business operations of its own or significant assets other than the Intercompany Note. The Initial Notes are and the Exchange Notes will be material liabilities of MCE Finance. As such, MCE Finance will be dependent upon payments from MPEL Investments under the Intercompany Note (and, in turn, MPEL Investments will be dependent upon payments from Melco Crown Gaming under one or more additional intercompany loans) to make any payments due on the Notes.

 

Each of the Guarantees provided by the Subsidiary Group Guarantors pursuant to the Initial Notes are and pursuant to the Exchange Notes will be subordinated to our Designated Senior Indebtedness.

 

The Guarantees provided by the Subsidiary Group Guarantors pursuant to the Initial Notes are and pursuant to the Exchange Notes will be the senior subordinated obligations of each of the Subsidiary Group Guarantors and are and will:

 

 

Upon any distribution to the creditors of such Subsidiary Group Guarantor in a liquidation, administration, bankruptcy, moratorium of payments, dissolution or other winding-up of such Subsidiary Group Guarantor, the lenders of our Designated Senior Indebtedness will be entitled to be paid in full before any payment may be made

with respect to the Guarantee provided by such Subsidiary Group Guarantor. As a result, holders of the Notes may receive less, ratably, than the lenders of our Designated Senior Indebtedness.

 

Claims of the secured creditors of each Guarantor will have priority with respect to their security over the claims of unsecured creditors, such as the holders of the Notes, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

 

Claims of the secured creditors of the Guarantors will have priority with respect to the assets securing their indebtedness over the claims of holders of the Notes. As such, each Guarantee pursuant to the Initial Notes is and pursuant to the Exchange Notes will be effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness and other secured obligations of the relevant Guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness or other obligations (other than to the extent such assets also secure the Notes and/or the relevant Guarantees on an equal and ratable basis or priority basis). In the event of any foreclosure, dissolution, winding up, liquidation, reorganization, administration or other bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding of any Guarantor that has secured obligations, holders of secured indebtedness will have prior claims to the assets of such Guarantor that constitute their collateral (other than to the extent such assets also secure the Notes and/or the relevant Guarantees on an equal and ratable basis or priority basis).

 

Subject to the limitations referred to under the caption “— The Guarantees may be challenged under applicable insolvency or fraudulent transfer laws, which could impair the enforceability of the Guarantees,” the holders of the Notes will participate, ratably with all holders of the unsecured indebtedness of the Parent, MPEL International and any future restricted subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Group Guarantor, and potentially with all of their other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor, in the remaining assets of the relevant Guarantor. The holders of the Notes will participate ratably with all holders of the unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of a Subsidiary Group Guarantor, and potentially with all of their other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor, in the remaining assets of the relevant Subsidiary Group Guarantor, following payment in full in cash of all obligations due under Designated Senior Indebtedness.

 

In the event that any of the secured indebtedness of the relevant Guarantor becomes due or the creditors thereunder proceed against the operating assets that secure such indebtedness, our assets remaining after repayment of that secured indebtedness may not be sufficient to repay all amounts owing in respect of the relevant Guarantee. As a result, holders of Notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of secured indebtedness of the relevant Guarantor.

 

The rights of holders of Notes under the Subordination Agreement to subordinate certain intra-group indebtedness will become effective after repayment in full under the City of Dreams Project Facility and the SBGF Facility.

 

On the date of the indenture, the Parent, MCE Finance and MPEL International entered into a subordination agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) with the Trustee providing for the contractual subordination in favor of the Trustee and the holders of the Notes of the Parent’s rights to receive payments with respect to all loans made prior to the issuance of the Notes by the Parent to MPEL International under any loan agreement between the Parent and MPEL International, as well as any loan that is made after the date of the indenture between the Parent, MCE Finance, MPEL International or any other subsidiary of the Parent that is not an obligor under the Senior Credit Agreement, the proceeds of which are on-lent by the borrower under such loan to a Subsidiary Group Guarantor by way of a Shareholders Subordinated Loan. In addition, upon the repayment or refinancing of the Senior Credit Agreement and the Subconcession Bank Guarantee Facility Agreement, and the release of the 2007 Subordination Deed, the intra-group loans and Sponsor Group Loans (as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement) that are subordinated in right of payment to the indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement shall also become contractually subordinated to the Notes. The rights of the lenders under such subordinated loans will be subordinated to the prior payment in full in cash to holders of the Notes of all Obligations due in respect of the Notes. The holders of the Notes will be entitled to receive payment in full in cash of all Obligations due in respect of the Notes before such lenders will be entitled to receive any payment or amounts due to them under and in respect of such subordinated loans, other than payments permitted under the indenture as provided in “Description of Exchange Notes — Certain Covenants — Restricted Payments.”

However, in connection with the City of Dreams Project Facility, the debtors and creditors in respect of certain intra-group loans (i) owed by an obligor under the City of Dreams Project Facility to us or any of our subsidiaries and (ii) designated as Sponsor Group Loans under the City of Dreams Project Facility have already entered into a subordination deed (the “2007 Subordination Deed”), pursuant to which each such creditor has agreed to assign by way of security their rights, title and interests in such intra-group loans, and each creditor and debtor of such intra-group loans has agreed to subordinate the right of payment of such intra-group loan to the Priority Indebtedness (as defined in the 2007 Subordination Deed). Priority Indebtedness includes the indebtedness under the City of Dreams Project Facility and the SBGF Agreement. The parties to the 2007 Subordination Deed include all of the Subsidiary Group Guarantors as well as the Parent and MPEL International.

 

In relation to the intra-group loans described above owed by a Subsidiary Group Guarantor to an obligor under the City of Dreams Project Facility, the holders of the Initial Notes are, and the holders of the Exchange Notes will be, only able to acquire subordination rights in relation to such intra-group loans once the Priority Indebtedness has been repaid in full or is being refinanced in full. See “Description of Exchange Notes — Subordination Agreement.”

 

If the validity or enforceability of the Subordination Agreement were successfully challenged for any reason, the Notes could be held to be effectively equal with or junior to certain earlier incurred obligations, including the intra-group loans and Sponsor Group Loans. Therefore, the priority status of the Notes with respect to our intra-group loans and Sponsor Group Loans depends on the validity and enforceability of the Subordination Agreement.

 

The financial statements contained in this prospectus are for the Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries, and no Guarantor has any obligation to provide its financial statements to holders of the Notes.

 

The financial statements contained in this prospectus are for the Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries and therefore a portion of results in the consolidated financial statements is not attributable to MCE Finance and its restricted subsidiaries. In addition, no Guarantor has any obligation in connection with the Notes to publish or make available its consolidated financial statements. The absence of financial statements for any Guarantor may make it difficult for holders of the Notes to assess the financial condition or results of the Guarantors or their compliance with the covenants in the indenture.

 

The following contains a summary of the material provisions of the exchange offer being made pursuant to the registration rights agreement, dated as of May 17, 2010, between MCE Finance, the Guarantors and the initial purchasers of the Initial Notes. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to an investor in the Notes. Reference is made to the provisions of the registration rights agreement, which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Copies of the registration rights agreement are available as set forth under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 

Terms of the Exchange Offer

 

In connection with the issuance of the Initial Notes, pursuant to a purchase agreement, dated as of May 12, 2010, between MCE Finance, the Guarantors and the initial purchasers of the Initial Notes, the holders of the Initial Notes from time to time became entitled to the benefits of the registration rights agreement.

 

Under the registration rights agreement, MCE Finance and the Guarantors agreed to file a registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, relating to an offer to exchange the Initial Notes for the Exchange Notes and to use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective under the Securities Act no later than 180 days after the date of original issue of the Initial Notes. MCE Finance and the Guarantors agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer to be consummated on or prior to the 30th business day, or longer if required by the federal securities laws, after the registration statement has been declared effective. MCE Finance and the Guarantors have also agreed to use all commercially reasonable efforts to keep the exchange offer open for a period required by applicable federal and state securities laws to consummate the exchange offer, but in any event for at least 20 business days.

 

Under certain circumstances, MCE Finance and the Guarantors will use all commercially reasonable efforts to file and to cause the SEC to declare effective a shelf registration statement with respect to the resale of the Initial Notes and MCE Finance and the Guarantors will use all commercially reasonable efforts to keep the shelf registration statement effective for up to one year after the date of the original issue of the Initial Notes. The circumstances include if MCE Finance and the Guarantors are not:

 

 

any holder of the Initial Notes notifies MCE Finance and the Guarantors prior to the 20th business day following the consummation of the exchange offer that it:

 

 

By tendering Initial Notes in exchange for relevant Exchange Notes, and executing the letter of transmittal for such Exchange Notes, you will represent to us that:

 

 

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, all Initial Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date will

be accepted for exchange. MCE Finance will issue Exchange Notes in exchange for an equal principal amount of outstanding Initial Notes accepted in the exchange offer. Initial Notes may be tendered only in minimum denominations of US$2,000 of principal amount and integral multiples of US$1,000 in excess thereof. This prospectus, together with the letter of transmittal, is being sent to all registered holders as of November 12, 2010. The exchange offer is not conditional upon any minimum principal amount of Initial Notes being tendered for exchange. However, our obligation to accept Initial Notes for exchange pursuant to the exchange offer is subject to certain customary conditions as set forth below under “— Conditions.”

 

Initial Notes shall be deemed to have been accepted as validly tendered when, as and if we have given oral or written notice of such acceptance to the exchange agent. The exchange agent will act as agent for the tendering holders of Initial Notes for the purposes of receiving the Exchange Notes and delivering the Exchange Notes to such holders.

 

Based on interpretations of the SEC staff set forth in no-action letters issued to unrelated third parties (including Morgan Stanley and Co., Inc. (available June 5, 1991) and Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation (available May 13, 1988), as interpreted in the SEC’s letter to Shearman & Sterling dated July 2, 1993) we believe that the Exchange Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by any holder of such Exchange Notes, without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act, provided that:

 

 

MCE Finance and the Guarantors have not sought, and do not intend to seek, a no-action letter from the SEC with respect to the effects of the exchange offer, and there can be no assurance that the SEC staff would make a similar determination with respect to the Exchange Notes as it has in previous no-action letters.

 

Any holder using the exchange offer to participate in a distribution of the Exchange Notes will acknowledge and agree that, if the resales are of Exchange Notes obtained by such holder in exchange for Initial Notes acquired directly from MCE Finance or any of its affiliates, it:

 

 

Each broker-dealer who holds Initial Notes acquired for its own account as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, and who receives Exchange Notes in exchange for the Initial Notes pursuant to the exchange offer, may be a statutory underwriter and must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of such Exchange Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of Exchange Notes received in exchange for Initial Notes, where such Initial Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the expiration date (as defined herein), we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

Upon consummation of the exchange offer, any Initial Notes not tendered will remain outstanding and continue to accrue interest at the rate of 10.25%, but, with limited exceptions, holders of Initial Notes who do not exchange their Initial Notes for Exchange Notes pursuant to the exchange offer will no longer be entitled to registration rights and will not be able to offer or sell their Initial Notes unless such Initial Notes are subsequently registered under the Securities Act, except pursuant to an exemption from or in a transaction not subject to the

Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. With limited exceptions, we will have no obligation to effect a subsequent registration of the Initial Notes.

 

Liquidated Damages

 

If any of the following events occur (each such event a “Registration Default”), MCE Finance and the Guarantors will pay each holder of applicable Initial Notes liquidated damages:

 

 

With respect to the first 90-day period immediately following the occurrence of the first Registration Default, liquidated damages will be paid in an amount equal to US$.05 per week per US$1,000 principal amount of Initial Notes. The amount of the liquidated damages will increase by an additional US$.05 per week per US$1,000 principal amount of Initial Notes with respect to each subsequent 90-day period until all Registration Defaults have been cured, up to a maximum amount of liquidated damages for all Registration Defaults of US$.50 per week per US$1,000 principal amount of Initial Notes.

 

All accrued liquidated damages will be paid by MCE Finance and the Guarantors on the next scheduled interest payment date to DTC or its nominee by wire transfer of immediately available funds and to holders of Certificated Notes by wire transfer to the accounts specified by them or by mailing checks to their registered addresses if no such accounts have been specified.

 

Following the cure of all Registration Defaults, the accrual of liquidated damages will cease.

 

Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments

 

The expiration date for the exchange offer shall be 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on December 21, 2010, unless we, in our sole discretion, extend the exchange offer, in which case the expiration date for the exchange offer shall be the latest date to which the exchange offer is extended.

 

To extend an expiration date, we will notify the exchange agent of any extension by oral or written notice and will notify the holders of the relevant Initial Notes by means of a press release or other written public announcement prior to 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration date for the exchange offer. Such notice to noteholders will disclose the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes that have been tendered as of the date of such notice and may state that we are extending the exchange offer for a specified time.

In relation to the exchange offer, we reserve the right to:

 

 

Any such delay in acceptance, extension, termination or amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by oral or written notice of such delay, extension or termination or amendment to the exchange agent. If the terms of the exchange offer are amended in a manner determined by us to constitute a material change, including the waiver of a material condition, we will promptly disclose such amendment in a manner reasonably calculated to inform you of such amendment, and we will extend the exchange offer if necessary so that at least five business days remain in the offer following notice of the material change.

 

Without limiting the manner in which we may choose to make public an announcement of any delay, extension or termination of the exchange offer, we shall have no obligations to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate any such public announcement, other than by making a timely release to an appropriate news agency.

 

Interest on the New Notes

 

Interest on the Exchange Notes will accrue at the rate of 10.25% per annum, accruing from the date of original issuance of the Initial Notes or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid on the corresponding Old Note surrendered in exchange for such Exchange Note to the day before the consummation of the exchange offer and thereafter, at the rate of 10.25% per annum, provided, that if an Old Note is surrendered for exchange on or after a record date for the Notes for an interest payment date that will occur on or after the date of such exchange and as to which interest will be paid, interest on the Exchange Note received in exchange for such Old Note will accrue from the date of such interest payment date. Interest on the Exchange Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing on November 15, 2010. No additional interest will be paid on the Initial Notes tendered and accepted for exchange except as provided in the registration rights agreement.

 

Procedures for Tendering

 

To tender in the exchange offer, you must complete, sign and date the letter of transmittal, or a facsimile of such letter of transmittal, have the signatures on such letter of transmittal guaranteed if required by such letter of transmittal, and mail or otherwise deliver such letter of transmittal or such facsimile, together with any other required documents, to the exchange agent prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

 

In addition, the following procedures apply:

 

 

We will only issue Exchange Notes in exchange for Initial Notes that are timely and properly tendered. The method of delivery of Initial Notes, letter of transmittal and all other required documents is at your election and risk. Rather than mail these items, we recommend that you use an overnight or hand delivery service. If such delivery is by mail, it is recommended that registered mail, properly insured, with return receipt requested, be used. In all cases,

sufficient time should be allowed to assure timely delivery and you should carefully follow the instructions on how to tender the Initial Notes. No Initial Notes, letters of transmittal or other required documents should be sent to us. Delivery of all Initial Notes (if applicable), letters of transmittal and other documents should be made to the exchange agent at its address set forth below under “— Exchange Agent.” You may also request your respective brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or nominees to effect such tender on your behalf. Neither we nor the exchange agent are required to tell you of any defects or irregularities with respect to your Initial Notes or the tenders thereof.

 

Your tender of Initial Notes will constitute an agreement between you and us in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal. Any beneficial owner whose Initial Notes are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and who wishes to tender should contact such registered holder promptly and instruct such registered holder to tender on his behalf.

 

Signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the case may be, must be guaranteed by any member firm of a registered national securities exchange or of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., a commercial bank or trust company having an office or correspondent in the United States or an “eligible guarantor” institution within the meaning of Rule 17Ad-15 under the Exchange Act (each an “Eligible Institution”) unless the Initial Notes tendered pursuant to such letter of transmittal or notice of withdrawal, as the case may be, are tendered:

 

 

If a letter of transmittal is signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers or corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, such persons should so indicate when signing, and unless waived by us, submit with such letter of transmittal evidence satisfactory to us of their authority to so act.

 

All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility, time of receipt and withdrawal of the tendered Initial Notes will be determined by us in our sole discretion, such determination being final and binding on all parties. We reserve the absolute right to reject any and all Initial Notes not properly tendered or any Initial Notes which, if accepted, would, in the opinion of counsel for us, be unlawful. We also reserve the absolute right to waive any irregularities or defects with respect to tender as to particular Initial Notes. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer, including the instructions in the letter of transmittal, will be final and binding on all parties. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in connection with tenders of Initial Notes must be cured within such time as we shall determine. Neither we, the exchange agent nor any other person shall be under any duty to give notification of defects or irregularities with respect to tenders of Initial Notes, nor shall any of them incur any liability for failure to give such notification. Tenders of Initial Notes will not be deemed to have been made until such irregularities have been cured or waived. Any Initial Notes received by the exchange agent that are not properly tendered and as to which the defects or irregularities have not been cured or waived will be returned without cost to such holder by the exchange agent, unless otherwise provided in the letter of transmittal, promptly following the expiration date.

 

For as long as the Notes are in global form and held in the name of Cede & Co., all tenders shall be submitted via ATOP (as hereinafter defined).

 

Acceptance of Initial Notes for Exchange; Delivery of Exchange Notes

 

Upon satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions to the exchange offer all Initial Notes properly tendered will be accepted promptly after the expiration date, and the Exchange Notes will be issued promptly after the expiration date. See “— Conditions.” For purposes of the exchange offer, Initial Notes shall be deemed to have been accepted as validly tendered for exchange when, as and if we have given oral or written notice thereof to the exchange agent. For each Old Note accepted for exchange, the holder of such Old Note will receive an Exchange Note having a principal amount equal to that of the surrendered Old Note.

In all cases, issuance of Exchange Notes for Initial Notes that are accepted for exchange pursuant to the exchange offer will be made only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:

 

 

If any tendered Initial Notes are not accepted for any reason set forth in the terms and conditions of the exchange offer, such unaccepted or such non-exchanged Initial Notes will be returned without expense to the tendering holder of such Initial Notes, if in certificated form, or credited to an account maintained with such book-entry transfer facility promptly after the expiration or termination of the exchange offer.

 

Book-Entry Transfer

 

The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account with respect to the Initial Notes at the book-entry transfer facility, DTC, for purposes of the exchange offer promptly after the date of this prospectus. Any financial institution that is a participant in the book-entry transfer facility’s systems may make book-entry delivery of Initial Notes by causing the book-entry transfer facility to transfer such Initial Notes into the exchange agent’s account for the relevant Notes at the book-entry transfer facility in accordance with such book-entry transfer facility’s procedures for transfer. However, although delivery of Initial Notes may be effected through book-entry transfer at the book-entry transfer facility, the letter of transmittal or facsimile thereof with any required signature guarantees and any other required documents, must, in any case, be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent at one of the addresses set forth below under “— Exchange Agent” on or prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date or the guaranteed delivery procedures described below must be complied with. Delivery of documents to the applicable book-entry transfer facility does not constitute delivery to the exchange agent.

 

Exchanging Book-Entry Notes

 

The exchange agent and the book-entry transfer facility, DTC, have confirmed that any financial institution that is a participant in the book-entry transfer facility may utilize the book-entry transfer facility’s Automated Tender Offer Program (“ATOP”) to tender Initial Notes.

 

Any participant in the book-entry transfer facility may make book-entry delivery of Initial Notes by causing the book-entry transfer facility to transfer such Initial Notes into the exchange agent’s account for the relevant Notes in accordance with the book-entry transfer facility’s ATOP procedures for transfer. However, the exchange for the Initial Notes so tendered will only be made after a book-entry confirmation of the book-entry transfer of such Initial Notes into the exchange agent’s account for the relevant Notes, and timely receipt by the exchange agent of an agent’s message and any other documents required by the letter of transmittal. The term “agent’s message” means a message, transmitted by the book-entry transfer facility and received by the exchange agent and forming part of a book-entry confirmation, which states that the book-entry transfer facility has received an express acknowledgement from a participant tendering Initial Notes that are the subject of such book-entry confirmation that such participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal, and that we may enforce such agreement against such participant.

 

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

 

If the procedures for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis, a tender may be effected if:

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal of Tenders

 

Tenders of Initial Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

 

For a withdrawal to be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be received by the exchange agent prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date at the address set forth below under “— Exchange Agent.” Any such notice of withdrawal must:

 

 

All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility and time of receipt of such notice will be determined by us, in our sole discretion, such determination being final and binding on all parties. Any Initial Notes so withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for exchange for purposes of the exchange offer. Any Initial Notes which have been tendered for exchange but which are not exchanged for any reason will be returned to the tendering holder of such Notes without cost to such holder, in the case of physically tendered Initial Notes, or credited to an account maintained with the book-entry transfer facility for the Initial Notes promptly after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the exchange offer. Properly withdrawn Initial Notes may be retendered by following one of the procedures described under “— Procedures for Tendering” and “— Book-Entry Transfer” above at any time on or prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

 

Conditions

 

Notwithstanding any other provision in the exchange offer, we shall not be required to accept for exchange, or to issue Exchange Notes in exchange for, any Initial Notes and may terminate or amend the exchange offer if at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date, we determine in our reasonable judgment that

the exchange offer violates applicable law, any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC or any order of any governmental agency or court of competent jurisdiction.

 

The foregoing conditions are for our sole benefit and may be asserted by us regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such condition or may be waived by us in whole or in part at any time and from time to time, prior to the expiration date, in our reasonable discretion. Our failure at any time to exercise any of the foregoing rights prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing right which may be asserted at any time and from time to time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

 

In addition, we will not accept for exchange any Initial Notes tendered, and no Exchange Notes will be issued in exchange for any such Initial Notes, if at any such time any stop order shall be threatened or in effect with respect to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part or the qualification of the indenture governing the Notes under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, MCE Finance and the Guarantors are required to use all commercially reasonable efforts to keep the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, and any shelf registration statement continuously effective, supplemented, amended and current.

 

Exchange Agent, Information Agent and Solicitation Agent

 

The Bank of New York Mellon has been appointed as exchange agent for the exchange offer. Their contact details are as follows:

 

 

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services has been appointed as information agent and solicitation agent for the exchange offer. Their contact details are as follows:

 

 

Questions and requests for assistance and requests for additional copies of this prospectus or of the letter of transmittal should be directed to the information agent addressed as above.

Fees and Expenses

 

The expenses of soliciting tenders pursuant to the exchange offer will be borne by MCE Finance and the Guarantors. The principal solicitation for tenders pursuant to the exchange offer is being made by mail; however, additional solicitations may be made by telegraph, telephone, telecopy or in person by our officers and regular employees.

 

We will not make any payments to or extend any commissions or concessions to any broker or dealer. We will, however, pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse the exchange agent for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith. We may also pay brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in forwarding copies of the prospectus and related documents to the beneficial owners of the Initial Notes and in handling or forwarding tenders for exchange.

 

The expenses of MCE Finance and the Guarantors in connection with the exchange offer include:

 

 

In connection with any shelf registration statement, MCE Finance and the Guarantors will reimburse the initial purchasers and the holders of Initial Notes for the reasonable fees and disbursements of not more than one counsel. Each holder will pay all underwriting discounts and commissions and transfer taxes, if any, relating to the sale or disposition of such holder’s Initial Notes pursuant to any shelf registration statement.

 

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

The exchange of an Initial Note for an Exchange Note pursuant to the exchange offer will not result in a taxable exchange to a beneficial owner of such Initial Note for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “Taxation — Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.”

 

Accounting Treatment

 

The Exchange Notes will be recorded as carrying the same value as the Initial Notes, which is face value adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, as reflected in our accounting records on the date of the exchange. Accordingly, we will not recognize any gain or loss for accounting purposes as a result of the exchange offer. The cost related to the exchange is capitalized as deferred financing cost.

 

Consequences of Failure to Exchange

 

Holders of Initial Notes who do not exchange their Initial Notes for Exchange Notes pursuant to the exchange offer will continue to be subject to the restrictions on transfer of such Initial Notes as set forth in the legend on such Initial Notes as a consequence of the issuance of the Initial Notes pursuant to exemptions from, or in transactions not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. In general, the Initial Notes may only be offered or sold pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or in a transaction not subject to the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We do not currently anticipate that we will register the Initial Notes under the Securities Act. To the extent that Initial Notes are tendered and accepted pursuant to the exchange offer, there may be little or no trading market for untendered and tendered but unacceptable Initial Notes. The restrictions on transfer may make the Initial Notes less attractive to potential investors than the Exchange Notes.

 

The exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the private offering of the Initial Notes. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the Exchange Notes under the exchange offer. In consideration for issuing the Exchange Notes as contemplated by this prospectus, we will receive the Initial Notes in the aggregate principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Exchange Notes. The Initial Notes surrendered in exchange for the Exchange Notes will be retired and canceled. Accordingly, the issuance of the Exchange Notes will not result in any increase in our indebtedness.

 

On May 26, 2010, we applied a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the Initial Notes (approximately US$578.9 million after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us) to reduce our indebtedness under our City of Dreams Project Facility by US$444.1 million. A portion of the net proceeds in the amount of US$133.0 million, which was initially held in a debt service accrual account related to the City of Dreams Project Facility, will be used to pay upcoming City of Dreams Project Facility amortization payments commencing December 2010.

 

The following table sets forth the actual capitalization of our company, which comprises Parent and its subsidiaries, including MCE Finance and its restricted subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2010.

 

Since this transaction is an exchange offer, no cash will be received or disbursed, and therefore the exchange offer does not affect our capitalization. You should read this table in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange Rate Information

 

Although we have certain expenses and revenues denominated in Patacas, our revenues and expenses are denominated predominantly in H.K. dollars and in connection with a portion of our indebtedness and certain expenses, U.S. dollars. The conversion of H.K. dollars into U.S. dollars in this prospectus is based on the noon buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers of H.K. dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Unless otherwise noted, all translations from H.K. dollars to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to H.K. dollars in this prospectus were made at a rate of HK$7.78 to US$1.00. The noon buying rate in effect as of June 30, 2010 was HK$7.7865 to US$1.00. We make no representation that any Hong Kong dollar or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or H.K. dollars, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. On October 29, 2010, the noon buying rate was HK$7.7513 to US$1.00.

 

The Hong Kong dollar is freely convertible into other currencies (including the U.S. dollar). Since October 7, 1983, the Hong Kong dollar has been officially linked to the U.S. dollar at the rate of HK$7.80 to US$1.00. The link is supported by an agreement between Hong Kong’s three bank note-issuing banks and the Hong Kong government pursuant to which bank notes issued by such banks are backed by certificates of indebtedness purchased by such banks from the Hong Kong Government Exchange Fund in U.S. dollars at the fixed exchange rate of HK$7.80 to US$1.00 and held as cover for the bank notes issued. When bank notes are withdrawn from circulation, the issuing bank surrenders certificates of indebtedness to the Hong Kong Government Exchange Fund and is paid the equivalent amount in U.S. dollars at the fixed rate of exchange. Hong Kong’s three bank note-issuing banks are The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Standard Chartered Bank and Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited.

 

In May 2005, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority broadened the link from the original rate of HK$7.80 per US$1.00 to a rate range of HK$7.75 to HK$7.85 per US$1.00. No assurance can be given that the Hong Kong government will maintain the link at HK$7.75 to HK$7.85 per US$1.00 or at all.

 

The following table sets forth the noon buying rate for U.S. dollars in The City of New York for cable transfers in H.K. dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

 

 

 

 

The Pataca is pegged to the Hong Kong dollar at a rate of HK$1.00 = MOP 1.03. All translations from Patacas to U.S. dollars in this prospectus were made at the exchange rate of MOP 8.0134 = US$1.00. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not certify for customs purposes a noon buying rate for cable transfers in Patacas.

 

The following selected historical consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the selected historical consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the selected historical balance sheets data as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. The following selected consolidated statements of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 have been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements, and have included, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statements. You should read this section in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and those financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

The following events/transactions affect the year-to-year comparability of the selected financial data presented above: